WEST HEMPSTEAD UFSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

205
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 475

LEVEL 1

131

28%

LEVEL 2

139

29%

LEVEL 3

131

28%

LEVEL 4

74

16%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

195
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 481

LEVEL 1

159

33%

LEVEL 2

127

26%

LEVEL 3

113

23%

LEVEL 4

82

17%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

93
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

54

25%

LEVEL 2

68

32%

LEVEL 3

60

28%

LEVEL 4

33

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

89
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

74

34%

LEVEL 2

57

26%

LEVEL 3

59

27%

LEVEL 4

30

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

112
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

77

30%

LEVEL 2

71

27%

LEVEL 3

71

27%

LEVEL 4

41

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

106
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

85

33%

LEVEL 2

70

27%

LEVEL 3

54

21%

LEVEL 4

52

20%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

30
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

5

10%

LEVEL 2

14

29%

LEVEL 3

14

29%

LEVEL 4

16

33%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

26
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

4

10%

LEVEL 2

12

29%

LEVEL 3

12

29%

LEVEL 4

14

33%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

51
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

18

20%

LEVEL 2

21

23%

LEVEL 3

26

29%

LEVEL 4

25

28%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

53
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

21

23%

LEVEL 2

18

20%

LEVEL 3

31

34%

LEVEL 4

22

24%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

36
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

39

36%

LEVEL 2

32

30%

LEVEL 3

25

23%

LEVEL 4

11

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

35
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

41

39%

LEVEL 2

28

27%

LEVEL 3

16

15%

LEVEL 4

19

18%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

76
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

67

32%

LEVEL 2

65

31%

LEVEL 3

59

28%

LEVEL 4

17

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

68
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

88

39%

LEVEL 2

67

30%

LEVEL 3

46

21%

LEVEL 4

22

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

195
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 408

LEVEL 1

86

21%

LEVEL 2

127

31%

LEVEL 3

124

30%

LEVEL 4

71

17%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

182
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 405

LEVEL 1

109

27%

LEVEL 2

114

28%

LEVEL 3

104

26%

LEVEL 4

78

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

45

67%

LEVEL 2

12

18%

LEVEL 3

7

10%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

50

66%

LEVEL 2

13

17%

LEVEL 3

9

12%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

196
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 429

LEVEL 1

105

24%

LEVEL 2

128

30%

LEVEL 3

122

28%

LEVEL 4

74

17%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

191
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 427

LEVEL 1

121

28%

LEVEL 2

115

27%

LEVEL 3

110

26%

LEVEL 4

81

19%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

9
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

26

57%

LEVEL 2

11

24%

LEVEL 3

9

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

38

70%

LEVEL 2

12

22%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

131
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

41

17%

LEVEL 2

66

28%

LEVEL 3

71

30%

LEVEL 4

60

25%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

140
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

48

20%

LEVEL 2

55

23%

LEVEL 3

77

32%

LEVEL 4

63

26%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

74
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

90

38%

LEVEL 2

73

31%

LEVEL 3

60

25%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

55
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

111

47%

LEVEL 2

72

30%

LEVEL 3

36

15%

LEVEL 4

19

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.