FLORAL PARK-BELLEROSE UFSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

451
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 621

LEVEL 1

60

10%

LEVEL 2

110

18%

LEVEL 3

217

35%

LEVEL 4

234

38%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

441
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 580

LEVEL 1

42

7%

LEVEL 2

97

17%

LEVEL 3

211

36%

LEVEL 4

230

40%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

202
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

23

8%

LEVEL 2

64

22%

LEVEL 3

102

35%

LEVEL 4

100

35%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

210
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

19

7%

LEVEL 2

50

18%

LEVEL 3

108

39%

LEVEL 4

102

37%

MALE

PROFICIENT

249
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

37

11%

LEVEL 2

46

14%

LEVEL 3

115

35%

LEVEL 4

134

40%

MALE

PROFICIENT

231
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

23

8%

LEVEL 2

47

16%

LEVEL 3

103

34%

LEVEL 4

128

43%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

95
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

9

7%

LEVEL 2

21

17%

LEVEL 3

34

27%

LEVEL 4

61

49%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

96
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

8

6%

LEVEL 2

21

17%

LEVEL 3

34

27%

LEVEL 4

62

50%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

282
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 374

LEVEL 1

28

7%

LEVEL 2

64

17%

LEVEL 3

139

37%

LEVEL 4

143

38%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

274
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

16

5%

LEVEL 2

51

15%

LEVEL 3

136

40%

LEVEL 4

138

40%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

7

32%

LEVEL 2

5

23%

LEVEL 3

7

32%

LEVEL 4

3

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

4

20%

LEVEL 2

7

35%

LEVEL 3

4

20%

LEVEL 4

5

25%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

55
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

13

15%

LEVEL 2

19

22%

LEVEL 3

32

37%

LEVEL 4

23

26%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

53
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

13

16%

LEVEL 2

17

20%

LEVEL 3

33

40%

LEVEL 4

20

24%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

431
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 555

LEVEL 1

26

5%

LEVEL 2

98

18%

LEVEL 3

205

37%

LEVEL 4

226

41%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

428
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 535

LEVEL 1

24

4%

LEVEL 2

83

16%

LEVEL 3

202

38%

LEVEL 4

226

42%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

20
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

34

52%

LEVEL 2

12

18%

LEVEL 3

12

18%

LEVEL 4

8

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

18

40%

LEVEL 2

14

31%

LEVEL 3

9

20%

LEVEL 4

4

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

448
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 608

LEVEL 1

55

9%

LEVEL 2

105

17%

LEVEL 3

214

35%

LEVEL 4

234

38%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

440
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 573

LEVEL 1

38

7%

LEVEL 2

95

17%

LEVEL 3

210

37%

LEVEL 4

230

40%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

5

38%

LEVEL 2

5

38%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

404
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 530

LEVEL 1

40

8%

LEVEL 2

86

16%

LEVEL 3

192

36%

LEVEL 4

212

40%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

385
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 495

LEVEL 1

30

6%

LEVEL 2

80

16%

LEVEL 3

178

36%

LEVEL 4

207

42%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

20

22%

LEVEL 2

24

26%

LEVEL 3

25

27%

LEVEL 4

22

24%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

56
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

12

14%

LEVEL 2

17

20%

LEVEL 3

33

39%

LEVEL 4

23

27%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.