Skip to Content
Main content

STEWART SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

278
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

10

3%

LEVEL 2

58

17%

LEVEL 3

130

38%

LEVEL 4

148

43%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

274
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 357

LEVEL 1

17

5%

LEVEL 2

66

18%

LEVEL 3

119

33%

LEVEL 4

155

43%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

141
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

33

19%

LEVEL 3

68

38%

LEVEL 4

73

41%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

137
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

7

4%

LEVEL 2

39

21%

LEVEL 3

61

33%

LEVEL 4

76

42%

MALE

PROFICIENT

137
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

6

4%

LEVEL 2

25

15%

LEVEL 3

62

37%

LEVEL 4

75

45%

MALE

PROFICIENT

137
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

10

6%

LEVEL 2

27

16%

LEVEL 3

58

33%

LEVEL 4

79

45%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

26
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

2

7%

LEVEL 3

6

21%

LEVEL 4

20

69%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

30
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

2

5%

LEVEL 2

5

14%

LEVEL 3

12

32%

LEVEL 4

18

49%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

237
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

7

2%

LEVEL 2

50

17%

LEVEL 3

115

39%

LEVEL 4

122

41%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

229
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

12

4%

LEVEL 2

55

19%

LEVEL 3

100

34%

LEVEL 4

129

44%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

2

14%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

6

43%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

3

19%

LEVEL 2

6

38%

LEVEL 3

4

25%

LEVEL 4

3

19%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

256
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

4

1%

LEVEL 2

50

16%

LEVEL 3

112

36%

LEVEL 4

144

46%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

252
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

9

3%

LEVEL 2

49

16%

LEVEL 3

107

35%

LEVEL 4

145

47%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

22
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

6

17%

LEVEL 2

8

22%

LEVEL 3

18

50%

LEVEL 4

4

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

22
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

8

17%

LEVEL 2

17

36%

LEVEL 3

12

26%

LEVEL 4

10

21%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

276
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

8

2%

LEVEL 2

57

17%

LEVEL 3

130

38%

LEVEL 4

146

43%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

272
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

8

2%

LEVEL 2

56

17%

LEVEL 3

126

38%

LEVEL 4

146

43%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

268
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 344

LEVEL 1

14

4%

LEVEL 2

62

18%

LEVEL 3

115

33%

LEVEL 4

153

44%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

4

40%

LEVEL 4

2

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

3

23%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

4

31%

LEVEL 4

2

15%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.