Skip to Content
Main content

VALLEY STREAM 13 UFSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

457
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 778

LEVEL 1

116

15%

LEVEL 2

205

26%

LEVEL 3

267

34%

LEVEL 4

190

24%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

503
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 805

LEVEL 1

105

13%

LEVEL 2

197

24%

LEVEL 3

260

32%

LEVEL 4

243

30%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

211
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 371

LEVEL 1

58

16%

LEVEL 2

102

27%

LEVEL 3

128

35%

LEVEL 4

83

22%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

248
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 409

LEVEL 1

56

14%

LEVEL 2

105

26%

LEVEL 3

133

33%

LEVEL 4

115

28%

MALE

PROFICIENT

246
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 407

LEVEL 1

58

14%

LEVEL 2

103

25%

LEVEL 3

139

34%

LEVEL 4

107

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

255
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 396

LEVEL 1

49

12%

LEVEL 2

92

23%

LEVEL 3

127

32%

LEVEL 4

128

32%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

138
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

25

11%

LEVEL 2

58

26%

LEVEL 3

72

33%

LEVEL 4

66

30%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

155
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

24

11%

LEVEL 2

45

20%

LEVEL 3

63

28%

LEVEL 4

92

41%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

81
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

13

10%

LEVEL 2

37

28%

LEVEL 3

45

34%

LEVEL 4

36

27%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

97
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

13

9%

LEVEL 2

33

23%

LEVEL 3

55

38%

LEVEL 4

42

29%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

112
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

37

17%

LEVEL 2

63

30%

LEVEL 3

68

32%

LEVEL 4

44

21%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

113
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

33

16%

LEVEL 2

60

29%

LEVEL 3

60

29%

LEVEL 4

53

26%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

107
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

38

20%

LEVEL 2

43

23%

LEVEL 3

74

39%

LEVEL 4

33

18%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

117
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

34

16%

LEVEL 2

58

28%

LEVEL 3

71

34%

LEVEL 4

46

22%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

451
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 720

LEVEL 1

85

12%

LEVEL 2

184

26%

LEVEL 3

262

36%

LEVEL 4

189

26%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

487
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 747

LEVEL 1

75

10%

LEVEL 2

185

25%

LEVEL 3

247

33%

LEVEL 4

240

32%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

31

53%

LEVEL 2

21

36%

LEVEL 3

5

9%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

16
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

30

52%

LEVEL 2

12

21%

LEVEL 3

13

22%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

450
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 742

LEVEL 1

98

13%

LEVEL 2

194

26%

LEVEL 3

260

35%

LEVEL 4

190

26%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

496
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 773

LEVEL 1

89

12%

LEVEL 2

188

24%

LEVEL 3

253

33%

LEVEL 4

243

31%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

7
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

18

50%

LEVEL 2

11

31%

LEVEL 3

7

19%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

7
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

16

50%

LEVEL 2

9

28%

LEVEL 3

7

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

342
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 544

LEVEL 1

73

13%

LEVEL 2

129

24%

LEVEL 3

191

35%

LEVEL 4

151

28%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

352
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 509

LEVEL 1

39

8%

LEVEL 2

118

23%

LEVEL 3

175

34%

LEVEL 4

177

35%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

115
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

43

18%

LEVEL 2

76

32%

LEVEL 3

76

32%

LEVEL 4

39

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

151
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

66

22%

LEVEL 2

79

27%

LEVEL 3

85

29%

LEVEL 4

66

22%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

503
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 800

LEVEL 1

102

13%

LEVEL 2

195

24%

LEVEL 3

260

33%

LEVEL 4

243

30%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.