LAWRENCE ROAD MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

86
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

110

40%

LEVEL 2

80

29%

LEVEL 3

53

19%

LEVEL 4

33

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

102
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 406

LEVEL 1

181

45%

LEVEL 2

123

30%

LEVEL 3

69

17%

LEVEL 4

33

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

42
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

39

33%

LEVEL 2

38

32%

LEVEL 3

20

17%

LEVEL 4

22

18%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

54
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

63

36%

LEVEL 2

57

33%

LEVEL 3

34

20%

LEVEL 4

20

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

44
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

71

45%

LEVEL 2

42

27%

LEVEL 3

33

21%

LEVEL 4

11

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

48
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

118

51%

LEVEL 2

66

28%

LEVEL 3

35

15%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

31
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

42

36%

LEVEL 2

43

37%

LEVEL 3

23

20%

LEVEL 4

8

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

38
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

70

43%

LEVEL 2

54

33%

LEVEL 3

28

17%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

50
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

67

44%

LEVEL 2

34

23%

LEVEL 3

27

18%

LEVEL 4

23

15%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

59
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

107

46%

LEVEL 2

68

29%

LEVEL 3

39

17%

LEVEL 4

20

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

101
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 359

LEVEL 1

142

40%

LEVEL 2

116

32%

LEVEL 3

68

19%

LEVEL 4

33

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

39

83%

LEVEL 2

7

15%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

86
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

77

32%

LEVEL 2

74

31%

LEVEL 3

53

22%

LEVEL 4

33

14%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

101
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 331

LEVEL 1

120

36%

LEVEL 2

110

33%

LEVEL 3

68

21%

LEVEL 4

33

10%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

33

85%

LEVEL 2

6

15%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

61

81%

LEVEL 2

13

17%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

17

23%

LEVEL 2

25

33%

LEVEL 3

24

32%

LEVEL 4

9

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

41

41%

LEVEL 2

30

30%

LEVEL 3

18

18%

LEVEL 4

12

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

93

46%

LEVEL 2

55

27%

LEVEL 3

29

14%

LEVEL 4

24

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

72
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

140

46%

LEVEL 2

93

30%

LEVEL 3

51

17%

LEVEL 4

21

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

83
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

104

40%

LEVEL 2

76

29%

LEVEL 3

50

19%

LEVEL 4

33

13%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

6

46%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.