LANDING SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

70
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

85

40%

LEVEL 2

60

28%

LEVEL 3

43

20%

LEVEL 4

27

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

81
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

63

30%

LEVEL 2

63

30%

LEVEL 3

47

23%

LEVEL 4

34

16%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

37
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

38

35%

LEVEL 2

35

32%

LEVEL 3

21

19%

LEVEL 4

16

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

48
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

23

22%

LEVEL 2

32

31%

LEVEL 3

29

28%

LEVEL 4

19

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

33
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

47

45%

LEVEL 2

25

24%

LEVEL 3

22

21%

LEVEL 4

11

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

33
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

40

38%

LEVEL 2

31

30%

LEVEL 3

18

17%

LEVEL 4

15

14%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

16
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

7

23%

LEVEL 2

7

23%

LEVEL 3

7

23%

LEVEL 4

9

30%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

23
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

5

13%

LEVEL 2

10

26%

LEVEL 3

14

37%

LEVEL 4

9

24%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

7

37%

LEVEL 2

7

37%

LEVEL 3

3

16%

LEVEL 4

2

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

7

47%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

5

33%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

42
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

71

45%

LEVEL 2

44

28%

LEVEL 3

29

18%

LEVEL 4

13

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

47
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

50

34%

LEVEL 2

49

34%

LEVEL 3

25

17%

LEVEL 4

22

15%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

69
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

54

30%

LEVEL 2

56

31%

LEVEL 3

42

23%

LEVEL 4

27

15%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

79
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

34

21%

LEVEL 2

51

31%

LEVEL 3

45

27%

LEVEL 4

34

21%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

31

86%

LEVEL 2

4

11%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

29

67%

LEVEL 2

12

28%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

64
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

38

25%

LEVEL 2

51

33%

LEVEL 3

37

24%

LEVEL 4

27

18%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

79
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

40

24%

LEVEL 2

48

29%

LEVEL 3

45

27%

LEVEL 4

34

20%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

6
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

47

76%

LEVEL 2

9

15%

LEVEL 3

6

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

23

58%

LEVEL 2

15

38%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

12

21%

LEVEL 2

17

29%

LEVEL 3

16

28%

LEVEL 4

13

22%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

17

22%

LEVEL 2

19

25%

LEVEL 3

23

30%

LEVEL 4

17

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

73

46%

LEVEL 2

43

27%

LEVEL 3

27

17%

LEVEL 4

14

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

46

35%

LEVEL 2

44

34%

LEVEL 3

24

18%

LEVEL 4

17

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.