Skip to Content
Main content

CHURCHVILLE-CHILI MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

417
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 875

LEVEL 1

204

23%

LEVEL 2

254

29%

LEVEL 3

255

29%

LEVEL 4

162

19%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

471
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 837

LEVEL 1

168

20%

LEVEL 2

198

24%

LEVEL 3

283

34%

LEVEL 4

188

22%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

186
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 424

LEVEL 1

104

25%

LEVEL 2

134

32%

LEVEL 3

113

27%

LEVEL 4

73

17%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

227
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 408

LEVEL 1

77

19%

LEVEL 2

104

25%

LEVEL 3

146

36%

LEVEL 4

81

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

231
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 451

LEVEL 1

100

22%

LEVEL 2

120

27%

LEVEL 3

142

31%

LEVEL 4

89

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

244
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 429

LEVEL 1

91

21%

LEVEL 2

94

22%

LEVEL 3

137

32%

LEVEL 4

107

25%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

16
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

15

34%

LEVEL 2

13

30%

LEVEL 3

9

20%

LEVEL 4

7

16%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

25
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

18

35%

LEVEL 2

8

16%

LEVEL 3

17

33%

LEVEL 4

8

16%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

365
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 704

LEVEL 1

133

19%

LEVEL 2

206

29%

LEVEL 3

224

32%

LEVEL 4

141

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

396
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 644

LEVEL 1

97

15%

LEVEL 2

151

23%

LEVEL 3

237

37%

LEVEL 4

159

25%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

13
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

27

46%

LEVEL 2

19

32%

LEVEL 3

9

15%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

30

50%

LEVEL 2

19

32%

LEVEL 3

8

13%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

22

44%

LEVEL 2

15

30%

LEVEL 3

9

18%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

26
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

18

29%

LEVEL 2

18

29%

LEVEL 3

17

27%

LEVEL 4

9

15%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

406
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 761

LEVEL 1

120

16%

LEVEL 2

235

31%

LEVEL 3

246

32%

LEVEL 4

160

21%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

460
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 744

LEVEL 1

102

14%

LEVEL 2

182

24%

LEVEL 3

273

37%

LEVEL 4

187

25%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

84

74%

LEVEL 2

19

17%

LEVEL 3

9

8%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

66

71%

LEVEL 2

16

17%

LEVEL 3

10

11%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

416
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 857

LEVEL 1

189

22%

LEVEL 2

252

29%

LEVEL 3

255

30%

LEVEL 4

161

19%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

468
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 819

LEVEL 1

156

19%

LEVEL 2

195

24%

LEVEL 3

281

34%

LEVEL 4

187

23%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

15

83%

LEVEL 2

2

11%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

12

67%

LEVEL 2

3

17%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

330
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 600

LEVEL 1

93

16%

LEVEL 2

177

30%

LEVEL 3

194

32%

LEVEL 4

136

23%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

386
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 587

LEVEL 1

67

11%

LEVEL 2

134

23%

LEVEL 3

225

38%

LEVEL 4

161

27%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

87
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

111

40%

LEVEL 2

77

28%

LEVEL 3

61

22%

LEVEL 4

26

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

85
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

101

40%

LEVEL 2

64

26%

LEVEL 3

58

23%

LEVEL 4

27

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.