Skip to Content
Main content

SCHOOL 33-JOHN JAMES AUDUBON GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

69
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 551

LEVEL 1

382

69%

LEVEL 2

100

18%

LEVEL 3

51

9%

LEVEL 4

18

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

97
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 557

LEVEL 1

314

56%

LEVEL 2

146

26%

LEVEL 3

66

12%

LEVEL 4

31

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

32
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

183

69%

LEVEL 2

51

19%

LEVEL 3

24

9%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

46
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

164

57%

LEVEL 2

78

27%

LEVEL 3

30

10%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

37
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

199

70%

LEVEL 2

49

17%

LEVEL 3

27

9%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

51
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

150

56%

LEVEL 2

68

25%

LEVEL 3

36

13%

LEVEL 4

15

6%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

9
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

19

56%

LEVEL 2

6

18%

LEVEL 3

6

18%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

43
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

190

66%

LEVEL 2

55

19%

LEVEL 3

35

12%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

41
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

158

56%

LEVEL 2

83

29%

LEVEL 3

24

9%

LEVEL 4

17

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

21
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

174

74%

LEVEL 2

40

17%

LEVEL 3

12

5%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

44
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

136

58%

LEVEL 2

54

23%

LEVEL 3

33

14%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

66
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 433

LEVEL 1

283

65%

LEVEL 2

84

19%

LEVEL 3

49

11%

LEVEL 4

17

4%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

82
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 433

LEVEL 1

224

52%

LEVEL 2

127

29%

LEVEL 3

56

13%

LEVEL 4

26

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

99

84%

LEVEL 2

16

14%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

90

73%

LEVEL 2

19

15%

LEVEL 3

10

8%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

67
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 467

LEVEL 1

308

66%

LEVEL 2

92

20%

LEVEL 3

50

11%

LEVEL 4

17

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

87
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 480

LEVEL 1

259

54%

LEVEL 2

134

28%

LEVEL 3

59

12%

LEVEL 4

28

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

74

88%

LEVEL 2

8

10%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

10
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

55

71%

LEVEL 2

12

16%

LEVEL 3

7

9%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

21

55%

LEVEL 2

9

24%

LEVEL 3

4

11%

LEVEL 4

4

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

22

45%

LEVEL 2

16

33%

LEVEL 3

10

20%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

61
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 513

LEVEL 1

361

70%

LEVEL 2

91

18%

LEVEL 3

47

9%

LEVEL 4

14

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

86
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 508

LEVEL 1

292

57%

LEVEL 2

130

26%

LEVEL 3

56

11%

LEVEL 4

30

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

66
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 501

LEVEL 1

342

68%

LEVEL 2

93

19%

LEVEL 3

49

10%

LEVEL 4

17

3%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

88
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 500

LEVEL 1

277

55%

LEVEL 2

135

27%

LEVEL 3

59

12%

LEVEL 4

29

6%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

40

80%

LEVEL 2

7

14%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

9
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

37

65%

LEVEL 2

11

19%

LEVEL 3

7

12%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.