Skip to Content
Main content

EUGENIO MARIA DE HOSTOS CHARTER GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

112
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 306

LEVEL 1

118

39%

LEVEL 2

76

25%

LEVEL 3

69

23%

LEVEL 4

43

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

104
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 343

LEVEL 1

146

43%

LEVEL 2

93

27%

LEVEL 3

80

23%

LEVEL 4

24

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

60
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

61

37%

LEVEL 2

42

26%

LEVEL 3

38

23%

LEVEL 4

22

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

56
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

84

43%

LEVEL 2

56

29%

LEVEL 3

44

22%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

52
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

57

40%

LEVEL 2

34

24%

LEVEL 3

31

22%

LEVEL 4

21

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

48
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

62

42%

LEVEL 2

37

25%

LEVEL 3

36

24%

LEVEL 4

12

8%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

20
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

32

46%

LEVEL 2

17

25%

LEVEL 3

14

20%

LEVEL 4

6

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

18
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

41

53%

LEVEL 2

19

24%

LEVEL 3

14

18%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

86
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

84

37%

LEVEL 2

57

25%

LEVEL 3

50

22%

LEVEL 4

36

16%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

82
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

102

40%

LEVEL 2

72

28%

LEVEL 3

63

25%

LEVEL 4

19

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

105
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

104

37%

LEVEL 2

70

25%

LEVEL 3

65

23%

LEVEL 4

40

14%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

99
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

126

40%

LEVEL 2

88

28%

LEVEL 3

76

24%

LEVEL 4

23

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

14

52%

LEVEL 2

6

22%

LEVEL 3

4

15%

LEVEL 4

3

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

20

67%

LEVEL 2

5

17%

LEVEL 3

4

13%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

98
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

88

35%

LEVEL 2

68

27%

LEVEL 3

61

24%

LEVEL 4

37

15%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

99
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

111

38%

LEVEL 2

84

29%

LEVEL 3

75

26%

LEVEL 4

24

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

14
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

30

58%

LEVEL 2

8

15%

LEVEL 3

8

15%

LEVEL 4

6

12%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

35

71%

LEVEL 2

9

18%

LEVEL 3

5

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

21

33%

LEVEL 2

16

25%

LEVEL 3

18

28%

LEVEL 4

9

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

22

32%

LEVEL 2

23

33%

LEVEL 3

17

25%

LEVEL 4

7

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

85
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

97

40%

LEVEL 2

60

25%

LEVEL 3

51

21%

LEVEL 4

34

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

80
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

124

45%

LEVEL 2

70

26%

LEVEL 3

63

23%

LEVEL 4

17

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

105
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

104

38%

LEVEL 2

68

25%

LEVEL 3

65

23%

LEVEL 4

40

14%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

99
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

127

41%

LEVEL 2

85

27%

LEVEL 3

76

24%

LEVEL 4

23

7%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

7
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

14

48%

LEVEL 2

8

28%

LEVEL 3

4

14%

LEVEL 4

3

10%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

19

59%

LEVEL 2

8

25%

LEVEL 3

4

13%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.