Skip to Content
Main content

FRED W HILL SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

213
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 357

LEVEL 1

61

17%

LEVEL 2

83

23%

LEVEL 3

116

32%

LEVEL 4

97

27%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

195
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 353

LEVEL 1

61

17%

LEVEL 2

97

27%

LEVEL 3

88

25%

LEVEL 4

107

30%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

109
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

33

18%

LEVEL 2

38

21%

LEVEL 3

61

34%

LEVEL 4

48

27%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

81
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

38

23%

LEVEL 2

45

27%

LEVEL 3

38

23%

LEVEL 4

43

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

104
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

28

16%

LEVEL 2

45

25%

LEVEL 3

55

31%

LEVEL 4

49

28%

MALE

PROFICIENT

114
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

23

12%

LEVEL 2

52

28%

LEVEL 3

50

26%

LEVEL 4

64

34%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

10
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

5

25%

LEVEL 2

5

25%

LEVEL 3

2

10%

LEVEL 4

8

40%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

9
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

4

21%

LEVEL 2

6

32%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

8

42%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

179
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

51

18%

LEVEL 2

60

21%

LEVEL 3

102

35%

LEVEL 4

77

27%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

160
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

43

16%

LEVEL 2

73

26%

LEVEL 3

74

27%

LEVEL 4

86

31%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

56%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

7

58%

LEVEL 3

4

33%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

4

13%

LEVEL 2

11

34%

LEVEL 3

9

28%

LEVEL 4

8

25%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

14

35%

LEVEL 2

10

25%

LEVEL 3

7

18%

LEVEL 4

9

23%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

203
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

28

9%

LEVEL 2

76

25%

LEVEL 3

109

36%

LEVEL 4

94

31%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

184
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

40

13%

LEVEL 2

78

26%

LEVEL 3

82

27%

LEVEL 4

102

34%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

33

66%

LEVEL 2

7

14%

LEVEL 3

7

14%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

21

41%

LEVEL 2

19

37%

LEVEL 3

6

12%

LEVEL 4

5

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

193
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 343

LEVEL 1

54

16%

LEVEL 2

96

28%

LEVEL 3

87

25%

LEVEL 4

106

31%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

7

70%

LEVEL 2

1

10%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

146
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

21

10%

LEVEL 2

43

20%

LEVEL 3

74

35%

LEVEL 4

72

34%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

135
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

17

9%

LEVEL 2

47

24%

LEVEL 3

56

28%

LEVEL 4

79

40%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

67
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

40

27%

LEVEL 2

40

27%

LEVEL 3

42

29%

LEVEL 4

25

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

60
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

44

29%

LEVEL 2

50

32%

LEVEL 3

32

21%

LEVEL 4

28

18%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

193
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

60

17%

LEVEL 2

95

27%

LEVEL 3

88

25%

LEVEL 4

105

30%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.