CAZENOVIA CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

290
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 471

LEVEL 1

43

9%

LEVEL 2

138

29%

LEVEL 3

155

33%

LEVEL 4

135

29%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

283
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 462

LEVEL 1

50

11%

LEVEL 2

129

28%

LEVEL 3

152

33%

LEVEL 4

131

28%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

144
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

23

10%

LEVEL 2

68

29%

LEVEL 3

77

33%

LEVEL 4

67

29%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

140
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

17

8%

LEVEL 2

64

29%

LEVEL 3

75

34%

LEVEL 4

65

29%

MALE

PROFICIENT

146
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

20

8%

LEVEL 2

70

30%

LEVEL 3

78

33%

LEVEL 4

68

29%

MALE

PROFICIENT

143
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

33

14%

LEVEL 2

65

27%

LEVEL 3

77

32%

LEVEL 4

66

27%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

4

67%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

279
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 449

LEVEL 1

39

9%

LEVEL 2

131

29%

LEVEL 3

150

33%

LEVEL 4

129

29%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

268
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 439

LEVEL 1

49

11%

LEVEL 2

122

28%

LEVEL 3

145

33%

LEVEL 4

123

28%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

3

30%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

3

30%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

1

10%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

2

20%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

287
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 427

LEVEL 1

20

5%

LEVEL 2

120

28%

LEVEL 3

154

36%

LEVEL 4

133

31%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

275
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 423

LEVEL 1

29

7%

LEVEL 2

119

28%

LEVEL 3

146

35%

LEVEL 4

129

30%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

23

52%

LEVEL 2

18

41%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

21

54%

LEVEL 2

10

26%

LEVEL 3

6

15%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

250
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 368

LEVEL 1

17

5%

LEVEL 2

101

27%

LEVEL 3

130

35%

LEVEL 4

120

33%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

246
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 373

LEVEL 1

26

7%

LEVEL 2

101

27%

LEVEL 3

127

34%

LEVEL 4

119

32%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

26

25%

LEVEL 2

37

36%

LEVEL 3

25

24%

LEVEL 4

15

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

24

27%

LEVEL 2

28

31%

LEVEL 3

25

28%

LEVEL 4

12

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

288
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 465

LEVEL 1

42

9%

LEVEL 2

135

29%

LEVEL 3

153

33%

LEVEL 4

135

29%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.