Skip to Content
Main content

NORTH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

87
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

41

25%

LEVEL 2

37

22%

LEVEL 3

58

35%

LEVEL 4

29

18%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

87
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

37

22%

LEVEL 2

46

27%

LEVEL 3

57

34%

LEVEL 4

30

18%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

39
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

17

22%

LEVEL 2

21

27%

LEVEL 3

26

34%

LEVEL 4

13

17%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

37
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

22

26%

LEVEL 2

25

30%

LEVEL 3

25

30%

LEVEL 4

12

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

48
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

24

27%

LEVEL 2

16

18%

LEVEL 3

32

36%

LEVEL 4

16

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

50
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

15

17%

LEVEL 2

21

24%

LEVEL 3

32

37%

LEVEL 4

18

21%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

10
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

4

25%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

7

44%

LEVEL 4

3

19%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

15
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

5

22%

LEVEL 2

3

13%

LEVEL 3

12

52%

LEVEL 4

3

13%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

61
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

25

22%

LEVEL 2

28

25%

LEVEL 3

39

34%

LEVEL 4

22

19%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

55
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

23

21%

LEVEL 2

29

27%

LEVEL 3

34

32%

LEVEL 4

21

20%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

5

31%

LEVEL 2

3

19%

LEVEL 3

5

31%

LEVEL 4

3

19%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

5

36%

LEVEL 2

4

29%

LEVEL 3

5

36%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

3

13%

LEVEL 2

12

52%

LEVEL 3

4

17%

LEVEL 4

4

17%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

82
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

26

19%

LEVEL 2

32

23%

LEVEL 3

53

38%

LEVEL 4

29

21%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

82
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

24

17%

LEVEL 2

39

27%

LEVEL 3

53

37%

LEVEL 4

29

20%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

15

60%

LEVEL 2

5

20%

LEVEL 3

5

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

13

52%

LEVEL 2

7

28%

LEVEL 3

4

16%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

2

4%

LEVEL 2

11

24%

LEVEL 3

19

42%

LEVEL 4

13

29%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

3

8%

LEVEL 2

6

16%

LEVEL 3

10

26%

LEVEL 4

19

50%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

55
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

39

33%

LEVEL 2

26

22%

LEVEL 3

39

33%

LEVEL 4

16

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

58
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

34

26%

LEVEL 2

40

30%

LEVEL 3

47

36%

LEVEL 4

11

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

71
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

39

27%

LEVEL 2

35

24%

LEVEL 3

49

34%

LEVEL 4

22

15%

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

76
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

35

23%

LEVEL 2

43

28%

LEVEL 3

49

32%

LEVEL 4

27

18%

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

16
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

2

10%

LEVEL 2

2

10%

LEVEL 3

9

45%

LEVEL 4

7

35%

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

11
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

3

19%

LEVEL 3

8

50%

LEVEL 4

3

19%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.