GENERAL BROWN CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

282
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 622

LEVEL 1

133

21%

LEVEL 2

207

33%

LEVEL 3

162

26%

LEVEL 4

120

19%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

290
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 604

LEVEL 1

133

22%

LEVEL 2

181

30%

LEVEL 3

172

28%

LEVEL 4

118

20%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

157
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

61

21%

LEVEL 2

79

27%

LEVEL 3

83

28%

LEVEL 4

74

25%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

149
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

56

19%

LEVEL 2

85

29%

LEVEL 3

75

26%

LEVEL 4

74

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

125
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

72

22%

LEVEL 2

128

39%

LEVEL 3

79

24%

LEVEL 4

46

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

141
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

77

25%

LEVEL 2

96

31%

LEVEL 3

97

31%

LEVEL 4

44

14%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

9
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

4

29%

LEVEL 4

5

36%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

3

30%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

259
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 576

LEVEL 1

125

22%

LEVEL 2

192

33%

LEVEL 3

153

27%

LEVEL 4

106

18%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

268
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 567

LEVEL 1

129

23%

LEVEL 2

170

30%

LEVEL 3

158

28%

LEVEL 4

110

19%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

3

23%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

3

23%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

2

25%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

4

36%

LEVEL 2

5

45%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

4

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

266
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 514

LEVEL 1

76

15%

LEVEL 2

172

33%

LEVEL 3

154

30%

LEVEL 4

112

22%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

279
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 504

LEVEL 1

78

15%

LEVEL 2

147

29%

LEVEL 3

166

33%

LEVEL 4

113

22%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

16
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

57

53%

LEVEL 2

35

32%

LEVEL 3

8

7%

LEVEL 4

8

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

55

55%

LEVEL 2

34

34%

LEVEL 3

6

6%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

205
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 381

LEVEL 1

58

15%

LEVEL 2

118

31%

LEVEL 3

110

29%

LEVEL 4

95

25%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

209
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 387

LEVEL 1

69

18%

LEVEL 2

109

28%

LEVEL 3

118

30%

LEVEL 4

91

24%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

77
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

75

31%

LEVEL 2

89

37%

LEVEL 3

52

22%

LEVEL 4

25

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

81
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

64

29%

LEVEL 2

72

33%

LEVEL 3

54

25%

LEVEL 4

27

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

282
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 617

LEVEL 1

130

21%

LEVEL 2

205

33%

LEVEL 3

162

26%

LEVEL 4

120

19%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.