Skip to Content
Main content

BUCKMAN HTS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

115
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

68

26%

LEVEL 2

77

30%

LEVEL 3

86

33%

LEVEL 4

29

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

122
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

99

31%

LEVEL 2

99

31%

LEVEL 3

82

26%

LEVEL 4

40

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

64
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

42

30%

LEVEL 2

36

25%

LEVEL 3

48

34%

LEVEL 4

16

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

68
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

50

29%

LEVEL 2

55

32%

LEVEL 3

51

29%

LEVEL 4

17

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

51
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

26

22%

LEVEL 2

41

35%

LEVEL 3

38

32%

LEVEL 4

13

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

54
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

49

33%

LEVEL 2

44

30%

LEVEL 3

31

21%

LEVEL 4

23

16%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

14
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

3

13%

LEVEL 2

6

26%

LEVEL 3

9

39%

LEVEL 4

5

22%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

9
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

6

27%

LEVEL 2

7

32%

LEVEL 3

4

18%

LEVEL 4

5

23%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

14
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

2

9%

LEVEL 2

6

27%

LEVEL 3

12

55%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

17
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

2

8%

LEVEL 2

5

21%

LEVEL 3

9

38%

LEVEL 4

8

33%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

67
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

32

22%

LEVEL 2

46

32%

LEVEL 3

48

33%

LEVEL 4

19

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

77
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

49

27%

LEVEL 2

55

30%

LEVEL 3

53

29%

LEVEL 4

24

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

13

45%

LEVEL 2

8

28%

LEVEL 3

6

21%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

21

48%

LEVEL 2

14

32%

LEVEL 3

9

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

18

44%

LEVEL 2

11

27%

LEVEL 3

11

27%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

21

43%

LEVEL 2

18

37%

LEVEL 3

7

14%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

111
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

57

23%

LEVEL 2

76

31%

LEVEL 3

83

34%

LEVEL 4

28

11%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

120
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

76

26%

LEVEL 2

93

32%

LEVEL 3

80

28%

LEVEL 4

40

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

11

69%

LEVEL 2

1

6%

LEVEL 3

3

19%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

23

74%

LEVEL 2

6

19%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

112
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

65

26%

LEVEL 2

73

29%

LEVEL 3

83

33%

LEVEL 4

29

12%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

118
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

91

30%

LEVEL 2

93

31%

LEVEL 3

79

26%

LEVEL 4

39

13%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

3

30%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

8

44%

LEVEL 2

6

33%

LEVEL 3

3

17%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

59
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

14

13%

LEVEL 2

34

32%

LEVEL 3

40

37%

LEVEL 4

19

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

23

20%

LEVEL 2

30

26%

LEVEL 3

36

31%

LEVEL 4

27

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

56
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

54

35%

LEVEL 2

43

28%

LEVEL 3

46

30%

LEVEL 4

10

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

59
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

76

37%

LEVEL 2

69

34%

LEVEL 3

46

23%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.