ORCHARD PARK CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

805
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,305

LEVEL 1

153

12%

LEVEL 2

347

27%

LEVEL 3

495

38%

LEVEL 4

310

24%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

789
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,314

LEVEL 1

155

12%

LEVEL 2

370

28%

LEVEL 3

498

38%

LEVEL 4

291

22%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

398
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 634

LEVEL 1

68

11%

LEVEL 2

168

26%

LEVEL 3

243

38%

LEVEL 4

155

24%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

393
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 643

LEVEL 1

74

12%

LEVEL 2

176

27%

LEVEL 3

255

40%

LEVEL 4

138

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

407
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 671

LEVEL 1

85

13%

LEVEL 2

179

27%

LEVEL 3

252

38%

LEVEL 4

155

23%

MALE

PROFICIENT

396
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 671

LEVEL 1

81

12%

LEVEL 2

194

29%

LEVEL 3

243

36%

LEVEL 4

153

23%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

17
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

2

8%

LEVEL 2

7

27%

LEVEL 3

7

27%

LEVEL 4

10

38%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

22
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

5

14%

LEVEL 2

10

27%

LEVEL 3

11

30%

LEVEL 4

11

30%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

24
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

2

7%

LEVEL 2

3

10%

LEVEL 3

14

48%

LEVEL 4

10

34%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

15
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

9

36%

LEVEL 3

5

20%

LEVEL 4

10

40%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

739
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,201

LEVEL 1

135

11%

LEVEL 2

327

27%

LEVEL 3

458

38%

LEVEL 4

281

23%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

733
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,211

LEVEL 1

139

11%

LEVEL 2

339

28%

LEVEL 3

469

39%

LEVEL 4

264

22%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

22
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

6

17%

LEVEL 2

7

20%

LEVEL 3

13

37%

LEVEL 4

9

26%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

5

17%

LEVEL 2

7

24%

LEVEL 3

12

41%

LEVEL 4

5

17%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

768
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,127

LEVEL 1

72

6%

LEVEL 2

287

25%

LEVEL 3

463

41%

LEVEL 4

305

27%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

750
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,147

LEVEL 1

77

7%

LEVEL 2

320

28%

LEVEL 3

469

41%

LEVEL 4

281

24%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

37
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

81

46%

LEVEL 2

60

34%

LEVEL 3

32

18%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

39
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

78

47%

LEVEL 2

50

30%

LEVEL 3

29

17%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

804
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,300

LEVEL 1

151

12%

LEVEL 2

345

27%

LEVEL 3

494

38%

LEVEL 4

310

24%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

784
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,303

LEVEL 1

152

12%

LEVEL 2

367

28%

LEVEL 3

494

38%

LEVEL 4

290

22%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

5
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

3

27%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

4

36%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

723
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,107

LEVEL 1

100

9%

LEVEL 2

284

26%

LEVEL 3

436

39%

LEVEL 4

287

26%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

710
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,133

LEVEL 1

124

11%

LEVEL 2

299

26%

LEVEL 3

439

39%

LEVEL 4

271

24%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

82
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

53

27%

LEVEL 2

63

32%

LEVEL 3

59

30%

LEVEL 4

23

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

79
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

31

17%

LEVEL 2

71

39%

LEVEL 3

59

33%

LEVEL 4

20

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

782
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,305

LEVEL 1

155

12%

LEVEL 2

368

28%

LEVEL 3

493

38%

LEVEL 4

289

22%

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

7
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

5

56%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.