Skip to Content
Main content

AKRON CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

216
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

59

16%

LEVEL 2

94

25%

LEVEL 3

121

33%

LEVEL 4

95

26%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

228
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 378

LEVEL 1

49

13%

LEVEL 2

101

27%

LEVEL 3

132

35%

LEVEL 4

96

25%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

115
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

22

12%

LEVEL 2

53

28%

LEVEL 3

64

34%

LEVEL 4

51

27%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

121
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

15

8%

LEVEL 2

47

26%

LEVEL 3

73

40%

LEVEL 4

48

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

101
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

37

21%

LEVEL 2

41

23%

LEVEL 3

57

32%

LEVEL 4

44

25%

MALE

PROFICIENT

107
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

34

17%

LEVEL 2

54

28%

LEVEL 3

59

30%

LEVEL 4

48

25%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

5

38%

LEVEL 3

5

38%

LEVEL 4

2

15%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

10
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

9

69%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

10
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

18

39%

LEVEL 2

18

39%

LEVEL 3

9

20%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

10
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

17

43%

LEVEL 2

13

33%

LEVEL 3

7

18%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

194
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

38

13%

LEVEL 2

71

23%

LEVEL 3

104

34%

LEVEL 4

90

30%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

204
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

30

9%

LEVEL 2

82

26%

LEVEL 3

115

36%

LEVEL 4

89

28%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

213
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 328

LEVEL 1

33

10%

LEVEL 2

82

25%

LEVEL 3

118

36%

LEVEL 4

95

29%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

222
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

34

10%

LEVEL 2

90

26%

LEVEL 3

127

37%

LEVEL 4

95

27%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

26

63%

LEVEL 2

12

29%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

15

47%

LEVEL 2

11

34%

LEVEL 3

5

16%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

144
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

19

9%

LEVEL 2

42

20%

LEVEL 3

74

36%

LEVEL 4

70

34%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

153
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

14

7%

LEVEL 2

43

20%

LEVEL 3

79

38%

LEVEL 4

74

35%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

72
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

40

24%

LEVEL 2

52

32%

LEVEL 3

47

29%

LEVEL 4

25

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

75
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

35

21%

LEVEL 2

58

35%

LEVEL 3

53

32%

LEVEL 4

22

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.