Skip to Content
Main content

WILLIAM STREET SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

438
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 695

LEVEL 1

84

12%

LEVEL 2

173

25%

LEVEL 3

225

32%

LEVEL 4

213

31%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

469
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 776

LEVEL 1

109

14%

LEVEL 2

198

26%

LEVEL 3

245

32%

LEVEL 4

224

29%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

205
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

37

11%

LEVEL 2

90

27%

LEVEL 3

111

33%

LEVEL 4

94

28%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

210
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 361

LEVEL 1

48

13%

LEVEL 2

103

29%

LEVEL 3

106

29%

LEVEL 4

104

29%

MALE

PROFICIENT

233
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

47

13%

LEVEL 2

83

23%

LEVEL 3

114

31%

LEVEL 4

119

33%

MALE

PROFICIENT

259
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 415

LEVEL 1

61

15%

LEVEL 2

95

23%

LEVEL 3

139

33%

LEVEL 4

120

29%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

5

29%

LEVEL 2

6

35%

LEVEL 3

3

18%

LEVEL 4

3

18%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

13
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

4

15%

LEVEL 2

10

37%

LEVEL 3

8

30%

LEVEL 4

5

19%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

12
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

1

7%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

10

67%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

13
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

5

24%

LEVEL 2

3

14%

LEVEL 3

5

24%

LEVEL 4

8

38%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

400
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 612

LEVEL 1

64

10%

LEVEL 2

148

24%

LEVEL 3

206

34%

LEVEL 4

194

32%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

422
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 677

LEVEL 1

89

13%

LEVEL 2

166

25%

LEVEL 3

223

33%

LEVEL 4

199

29%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

18
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

11

28%

LEVEL 2

10

26%

LEVEL 3

13

33%

LEVEL 4

5

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

18
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

8

22%

LEVEL 2

11

30%

LEVEL 3

6

16%

LEVEL 4

12

32%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

425
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 611

LEVEL 1

37

6%

LEVEL 2

149

24%

LEVEL 3

216

35%

LEVEL 4

209

34%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

453
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 679

LEVEL 1

54

8%

LEVEL 2

172

25%

LEVEL 3

235

35%

LEVEL 4

218

32%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

47

56%

LEVEL 2

24

29%

LEVEL 3

9

11%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

16
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

55

57%

LEVEL 2

26

27%

LEVEL 3

10

10%

LEVEL 4

6

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

437
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 690

LEVEL 1

81

12%

LEVEL 2

172

25%

LEVEL 3

224

32%

LEVEL 4

213

31%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

467
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 770

LEVEL 1

106

14%

LEVEL 2

197

26%

LEVEL 3

244

32%

LEVEL 4

223

29%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

360
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 519

LEVEL 1

50

10%

LEVEL 2

109

21%

LEVEL 3

173

33%

LEVEL 4

187

36%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

392
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 599

LEVEL 1

68

11%

LEVEL 2

139

23%

LEVEL 3

199

33%

LEVEL 4

193

32%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

78
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

34

19%

LEVEL 2

64

36%

LEVEL 3

52

30%

LEVEL 4

26

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

77
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

41

23%

LEVEL 2

59

33%

LEVEL 3

46

26%

LEVEL 4

31

18%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.