EVANS-BRANT CSD (LAKE SHORE) GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

271
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 683

LEVEL 1

216

32%

LEVEL 2

196

29%

LEVEL 3

173

25%

LEVEL 4

98

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

288
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 724

LEVEL 1

236

33%

LEVEL 2

200

28%

LEVEL 3

189

26%

LEVEL 4

99

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

115
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

108

34%

LEVEL 2

94

30%

LEVEL 3

77

24%

LEVEL 4

38

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

137
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

100

30%

LEVEL 2

99

29%

LEVEL 3

93

28%

LEVEL 4

44

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

156
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

108

30%

LEVEL 2

102

28%

LEVEL 3

96

26%

LEVEL 4

60

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

151
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 388

LEVEL 1

136

35%

LEVEL 2

101

26%

LEVEL 3

96

25%

LEVEL 4

55

14%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

6

35%

LEVEL 2

8

47%

LEVEL 3

2

12%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

11

58%

LEVEL 2

3

16%

LEVEL 3

4

21%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

22
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

45

46%

LEVEL 2

30

31%

LEVEL 3

19

20%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

28
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

47

44%

LEVEL 2

31

29%

LEVEL 3

23

22%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

234
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 540

LEVEL 1

155

29%

LEVEL 2

151

28%

LEVEL 3

146

27%

LEVEL 4

88

16%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

245
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 563

LEVEL 1

162

29%

LEVEL 2

156

28%

LEVEL 3

157

28%

LEVEL 4

88

16%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

8

44%

LEVEL 2

3

17%

LEVEL 3

4

22%

LEVEL 4

3

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

11

41%

LEVEL 2

9

33%

LEVEL 3

4

15%

LEVEL 4

3

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

254
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 550

LEVEL 1

120

22%

LEVEL 2

176

32%

LEVEL 3

163

30%

LEVEL 4

91

17%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

277
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 592

LEVEL 1

141

24%

LEVEL 2

174

29%

LEVEL 3

181

31%

LEVEL 4

96

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

17
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

96

72%

LEVEL 2

20

15%

LEVEL 3

10

8%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

95

72%

LEVEL 2

26

20%

LEVEL 3

8

6%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

154
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

73

23%

LEVEL 2

92

29%

LEVEL 3

91

29%

LEVEL 4

63

20%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

170
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 344

LEVEL 1

78

23%

LEVEL 2

96

28%

LEVEL 3

107

31%

LEVEL 4

63

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

117
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 364

LEVEL 1

143

39%

LEVEL 2

104

29%

LEVEL 3

82

23%

LEVEL 4

35

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

118
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 380

LEVEL 1

158

42%

LEVEL 2

104

27%

LEVEL 3

82

22%

LEVEL 4

36

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.