Skip to Content
Main content

CLEVELAND HILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

142
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

45

18%

LEVEL 2

61

25%

LEVEL 3

76

31%

LEVEL 4

66

27%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

133
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

42

17%

LEVEL 2

77

31%

LEVEL 3

65

26%

LEVEL 4

68

27%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

65
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

22

18%

LEVEL 2

32

27%

LEVEL 3

33

28%

LEVEL 4

32

27%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

52
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

15

14%

LEVEL 2

44

40%

LEVEL 3

25

23%

LEVEL 4

27

24%

MALE

PROFICIENT

77
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

23

18%

LEVEL 2

29

22%

LEVEL 3

43

33%

LEVEL 4

34

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

81
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

27

19%

LEVEL 2

33

23%

LEVEL 3

40

28%

LEVEL 4

41

29%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

9
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

3

15%

LEVEL 2

8

40%

LEVEL 3

6

30%

LEVEL 4

3

15%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

13
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

4

17%

LEVEL 2

7

29%

LEVEL 3

9

38%

LEVEL 4

4

17%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

85
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

17

13%

LEVEL 2

24

19%

LEVEL 3

37

29%

LEVEL 4

48

38%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

72
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

18

15%

LEVEL 2

32

26%

LEVEL 3

22

18%

LEVEL 4

50

41%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

31
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

17

24%

LEVEL 2

22

31%

LEVEL 3

25

36%

LEVEL 4

6

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

34
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

12

16%

LEVEL 2

29

39%

LEVEL 3

24

32%

LEVEL 4

10

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

7

30%

LEVEL 2

5

22%

LEVEL 3

5

22%

LEVEL 4

6

26%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

8

36%

LEVEL 2

8

36%

LEVEL 3

3

14%

LEVEL 4

3

14%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

139
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

24

11%

LEVEL 2

57

26%

LEVEL 3

73

33%

LEVEL 4

66

30%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

125
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

26

12%

LEVEL 2

71

32%

LEVEL 3

60

27%

LEVEL 4

65

29%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

21

75%

LEVEL 2

4

14%

LEVEL 3

3

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

16

53%

LEVEL 2

6

20%

LEVEL 3

5

17%

LEVEL 4

3

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

137
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

38

16%

LEVEL 2

59

25%

LEVEL 3

72

31%

LEVEL 4

65

28%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

128
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

41

17%

LEVEL 2

72

30%

LEVEL 3

60

25%

LEVEL 4

68

28%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

7

50%

LEVEL 2

2

14%

LEVEL 3

4

29%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

1

9%

LEVEL 2

5

45%

LEVEL 3

5

45%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

64
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

7

8%

LEVEL 2

15

17%

LEVEL 3

30

35%

LEVEL 4

34

40%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

64
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

8

9%

LEVEL 2

17

19%

LEVEL 3

25

28%

LEVEL 4

39

44%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

78
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

38

23%

LEVEL 2

46

28%

LEVEL 3

46

28%

LEVEL 4

32

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

69
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

34

21%

LEVEL 2

60

37%

LEVEL 3

40

25%

LEVEL 4

29

18%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

141
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

42

17%

LEVEL 2

60

25%

LEVEL 3

75

31%

LEVEL 4

66

27%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.