Skip to Content
Main content

WEST HERTEL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

45
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 503

LEVEL 1

351

70%

LEVEL 2

107

21%

LEVEL 3

35

7%

LEVEL 4

10

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

79
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 488

LEVEL 1

298

61%

LEVEL 2

111

23%

LEVEL 3

52

11%

LEVEL 4

27

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

21
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

149

66%

LEVEL 2

55

24%

LEVEL 3

16

7%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

42
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

122

54%

LEVEL 2

62

27%

LEVEL 3

27

12%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

24
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

202

73%

LEVEL 2

52

19%

LEVEL 3

19

7%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

37
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

176

67%

LEVEL 2

49

19%

LEVEL 3

25

10%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

18
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

60

56%

LEVEL 2

30

28%

LEVEL 3

13

12%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

28
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

46

46%

LEVEL 2

27

27%

LEVEL 3

17

17%

LEVEL 4

11

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

9
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

34

59%

LEVEL 2

15

26%

LEVEL 3

8

14%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

11
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

32

56%

LEVEL 2

14

25%

LEVEL 3

5

9%

LEVEL 4

6

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

12
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

187

80%

LEVEL 2

34

15%

LEVEL 3

11

5%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

25
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

160

70%

LEVEL 2

42

19%

LEVEL 3

17

7%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

68

76%

LEVEL 2

19

21%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

52

60%

LEVEL 2

24

28%

LEVEL 3

10

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

42
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 437

LEVEL 1

295

68%

LEVEL 2

100

23%

LEVEL 3

32

7%

LEVEL 4

10

2%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

74
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 431

LEVEL 1

253

59%

LEVEL 2

104

24%

LEVEL 3

49

11%

LEVEL 4

25

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

56

85%

LEVEL 2

7

11%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

45

79%

LEVEL 2

7

12%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

41
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

192

60%

LEVEL 2

88

27%

LEVEL 3

31

10%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

69
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 322

LEVEL 1

170

53%

LEVEL 2

83

26%

LEVEL 3

45

14%

LEVEL 4

24

7%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

159

87%

LEVEL 2

19

10%

LEVEL 3

4

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

10
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

128

77%

LEVEL 2

28

17%

LEVEL 3

7

4%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

32

60%

LEVEL 2

13

25%

LEVEL 3

5

9%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

20

44%

LEVEL 2

15

33%

LEVEL 3

6

13%

LEVEL 4

4

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 450

LEVEL 1

319

71%

LEVEL 2

94

21%

LEVEL 3

30

7%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

69
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 443

LEVEL 1

278

63%

LEVEL 2

96

22%

LEVEL 3

46

10%

LEVEL 4

23

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

45
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 490

LEVEL 1

340

69%

LEVEL 2

105

21%

LEVEL 3

35

7%

LEVEL 4

10

2%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

78
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 481

LEVEL 1

293

61%

LEVEL 2

110

23%

LEVEL 3

51

11%

LEVEL 4

27

6%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

11

85%

LEVEL 2

2

15%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

5

71%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.