Skip to Content
Main content

FREDERICK OLMSTED #156 GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

153
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

46

15%

LEVEL 2

105

35%

LEVEL 3

101

33%

LEVEL 4

52

17%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

168
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 323

LEVEL 1

63

20%

LEVEL 2

92

28%

LEVEL 3

94

29%

LEVEL 4

74

23%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

93
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

14

9%

LEVEL 2

55

34%

LEVEL 3

64

40%

LEVEL 4

29

18%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

83
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

23

14%

LEVEL 2

60

36%

LEVEL 3

46

28%

LEVEL 4

37

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

60
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

32

23%

LEVEL 2

50

35%

LEVEL 3

37

26%

LEVEL 4

23

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

85
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

40

25%

LEVEL 2

32

20%

LEVEL 3

48

31%

LEVEL 4

37

24%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

13
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

32%

LEVEL 3

7

37%

LEVEL 4

6

32%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

22
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

2

7%

LEVEL 2

4

14%

LEVEL 3

14

50%

LEVEL 4

8

29%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

61
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

8

8%

LEVEL 2

33

32%

LEVEL 3

38

37%

LEVEL 4

23

23%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

63
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

13

12%

LEVEL 2

29

28%

LEVEL 3

27

26%

LEVEL 4

36

34%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

51
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

18

16%

LEVEL 2

41

37%

LEVEL 3

36

33%

LEVEL 4

15

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

48
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

29

26%

LEVEL 2

33

30%

LEVEL 3

27

25%

LEVEL 4

21

19%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

15

29%

LEVEL 2

20

38%

LEVEL 3

14

27%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

18
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

16

31%

LEVEL 2

17

33%

LEVEL 3

12

24%

LEVEL 4

6

12%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

144
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

24

9%

LEVEL 2

95

36%

LEVEL 3

94

36%

LEVEL 4

50

19%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

157
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

38

14%

LEVEL 2

81

29%

LEVEL 3

85

31%

LEVEL 4

72

26%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

22

54%

LEVEL 2

10

24%

LEVEL 3

7

17%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

25

53%

LEVEL 2

11

23%

LEVEL 3

9

19%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

97
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

18

10%

LEVEL 2

62

35%

LEVEL 3

63

36%

LEVEL 4

34

19%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

99
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

19

12%

LEVEL 2

47

28%

LEVEL 3

49

30%

LEVEL 4

50

30%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

56
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

28

22%

LEVEL 2

43

34%

LEVEL 3

38

30%

LEVEL 4

18

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

69
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

44

28%

LEVEL 2

45

28%

LEVEL 3

45

28%

LEVEL 4

24

15%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.