Skip to Content
Main content

MARVA J DANIEL FUTURES PREP SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

18
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

153

70%

LEVEL 2

49

22%

LEVEL 3

14

6%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

31
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

187

69%

LEVEL 2

54

20%

LEVEL 3

22

8%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

10
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

79

66%

LEVEL 2

30

25%

LEVEL 3

7

6%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

14
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

82

67%

LEVEL 2

27

22%

LEVEL 3

11

9%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

8
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

74

73%

LEVEL 2

19

19%

LEVEL 3

7

7%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

17
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

105

70%

LEVEL 2

27

18%

LEVEL 3

11

7%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

10

43%

LEVEL 2

5

22%

LEVEL 3

4

17%

LEVEL 4

4

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

9

50%

LEVEL 2

7

39%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

3
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

11

61%

LEVEL 2

4

22%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

2

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

13
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

118

73%

LEVEL 2

30

19%

LEVEL 3

11

7%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

15
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

142

73%

LEVEL 2

37

19%

LEVEL 3

12

6%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

16

67%

LEVEL 2

7

29%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

18

64%

LEVEL 2

6

21%

LEVEL 3

4

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

17
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

101

64%

LEVEL 2

40

25%

LEVEL 3

13

8%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

30
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

125

62%

LEVEL 2

46

23%

LEVEL 3

21

10%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

52

84%

LEVEL 2

9

15%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

62

87%

LEVEL 2

8

11%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

18
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

139

68%

LEVEL 2

46

23%

LEVEL 3

14

7%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

26
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

152

68%

LEVEL 2

47

21%

LEVEL 3

19

8%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

14

82%

LEVEL 2

3

18%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

35

74%

LEVEL 2

7

15%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

6

60%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

149

70%

LEVEL 2

47

22%

LEVEL 3

13

6%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

181

69%

LEVEL 2

52

20%

LEVEL 3

21

8%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

15
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

140

70%

LEVEL 2

45

23%

LEVEL 3

12

6%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

28
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

180

70%

LEVEL 2

50

19%

LEVEL 3

20

8%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

13

65%

LEVEL 2

4

20%

LEVEL 3

2

10%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

7

50%

LEVEL 2

4

29%

LEVEL 3

2

14%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.