Skip to Content
Main content

D'YOUVILLE-PORTER CAMPUS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

35
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 403

LEVEL 1

303

75%

LEVEL 2

65

16%

LEVEL 3

28

7%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

47
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 390

LEVEL 1

261

67%

LEVEL 2

82

21%

LEVEL 3

30

8%

LEVEL 4

17

4%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

15
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

156

77%

LEVEL 2

32

16%

LEVEL 3

11

5%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

20
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

130

66%

LEVEL 2

47

24%

LEVEL 3

12

6%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

20
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

147

74%

LEVEL 2

33

17%

LEVEL 3

17

9%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

27
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

131

68%

LEVEL 2

35

18%

LEVEL 3

18

9%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

4

27%

LEVEL 2

3

20%

LEVEL 3

3

20%

LEVEL 4

5

33%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

3
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

11

61%

LEVEL 2

4

22%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

9

50%

LEVEL 2

7

39%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

39

71%

LEVEL 2

11

20%

LEVEL 3

5

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

28

61%

LEVEL 2

13

28%

LEVEL 3

5

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

18
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

242

79%

LEVEL 2

45

15%

LEVEL 3

17

6%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

30
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

220

72%

LEVEL 2

57

19%

LEVEL 3

19

6%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

34
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 329

LEVEL 1

234

71%

LEVEL 2

61

19%

LEVEL 3

27

8%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

42
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 323

LEVEL 1

205

63%

LEVEL 2

76

24%

LEVEL 3

27

8%

LEVEL 4

15

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

69

93%

LEVEL 2

4

5%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

56

84%

LEVEL 2

6

9%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

32
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

129

60%

LEVEL 2

54

25%

LEVEL 3

26

12%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

44
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

107

49%

LEVEL 2

67

31%

LEVEL 3

28

13%

LEVEL 4

16

7%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

174

93%

LEVEL 2

11

6%

LEVEL 3

2

1%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

154

90%

LEVEL 2

15

9%

LEVEL 3

2

1%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

27

61%

LEVEL 2

11

25%

LEVEL 3

5

11%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

12

41%

LEVEL 2

11

38%

LEVEL 3

4

14%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 359

LEVEL 1

276

77%

LEVEL 2

54

15%

LEVEL 3

23

6%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 361

LEVEL 1

249

69%

LEVEL 2

71

20%

LEVEL 3

26

7%

LEVEL 4

15

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

33
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

256

73%

LEVEL 2

63

18%

LEVEL 3

26

7%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

46
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 371

LEVEL 1

246

66%

LEVEL 2

79

21%

LEVEL 3

30

8%

LEVEL 4

16

4%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

47

92%

LEVEL 2

2

4%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

15

79%

LEVEL 2

3

16%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.