Skip to Content
Main content

SPACKENKILL UFSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

239
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 465

LEVEL 1

92

20%

LEVEL 2

134

29%

LEVEL 3

134

29%

LEVEL 4

105

23%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

303
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 519

LEVEL 1

94

18%

LEVEL 2

122

24%

LEVEL 3

166

32%

LEVEL 4

137

26%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

115
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

45

20%

LEVEL 2

67

30%

LEVEL 3

67

30%

LEVEL 4

48

21%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

140
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

43

18%

LEVEL 2

57

24%

LEVEL 3

77

32%

LEVEL 4

63

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

124
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

47

20%

LEVEL 2

67

28%

LEVEL 3

67

28%

LEVEL 4

57

24%

MALE

PROFICIENT

163
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

51

18%

LEVEL 2

65

23%

LEVEL 3

89

32%

LEVEL 4

74

27%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

5

31%

LEVEL 2

3

19%

LEVEL 3

6

38%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

51
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

6

9%

LEVEL 2

7

11%

LEVEL 3

23

36%

LEVEL 4

28

44%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

56
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

3

4%

LEVEL 2

12

17%

LEVEL 3

14

20%

LEVEL 4

42

59%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

131
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

34

15%

LEVEL 2

65

28%

LEVEL 3

71

31%

LEVEL 4

60

26%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

172
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

35

13%

LEVEL 2

56

21%

LEVEL 3

100

38%

LEVEL 4

72

27%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

32

46%

LEVEL 2

27

39%

LEVEL 3

6

9%

LEVEL 4

5

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

23
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

28

37%

LEVEL 2

25

33%

LEVEL 3

15

20%

LEVEL 4

8

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

38
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

15

18%

LEVEL 2

32

38%

LEVEL 3

28

33%

LEVEL 4

10

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

41
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

19

23%

LEVEL 2

23

28%

LEVEL 3

31

37%

LEVEL 4

10

12%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

234
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 415

LEVEL 1

59

14%

LEVEL 2

122

29%

LEVEL 3

131

32%

LEVEL 4

103

25%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

294
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 457

LEVEL 1

50

11%

LEVEL 2

113

25%

LEVEL 3

161

35%

LEVEL 4

133

29%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

33

66%

LEVEL 2

12

24%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

44

71%

LEVEL 2

9

15%

LEVEL 3

5

8%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

237
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 459

LEVEL 1

91

20%

LEVEL 2

131

29%

LEVEL 3

133

29%

LEVEL 4

104

23%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

300
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 510

LEVEL 1

92

18%

LEVEL 2

118

23%

LEVEL 3

165

32%

LEVEL 4

135

26%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

207
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 344

LEVEL 1

50

15%

LEVEL 2

87

25%

LEVEL 3

114

33%

LEVEL 4

93

27%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

256
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 384

LEVEL 1

48

13%

LEVEL 2

80

21%

LEVEL 3

132

34%

LEVEL 4

124

32%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

42

35%

LEVEL 2

47

39%

LEVEL 3

20

17%

LEVEL 4

12

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

46

34%

LEVEL 2

42

31%

LEVEL 3

34

25%

LEVEL 4

13

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.