LAGRANGE MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

154
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 526

LEVEL 1

207

39%

LEVEL 2

165

31%

LEVEL 3

97

18%

LEVEL 4

57

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

169
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 583

LEVEL 1

233

40%

LEVEL 2

181

31%

LEVEL 3

104

18%

LEVEL 4

65

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

79
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

85

34%

LEVEL 2

88

35%

LEVEL 3

55

22%

LEVEL 4

24

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

74
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

107

41%

LEVEL 2

82

31%

LEVEL 3

41

16%

LEVEL 4

33

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

75
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

122

45%

LEVEL 2

77

28%

LEVEL 3

42

15%

LEVEL 4

33

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

95
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

126

39%

LEVEL 2

99

31%

LEVEL 3

63

20%

LEVEL 4

32

10%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

11
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

3

14%

LEVEL 2

7

33%

LEVEL 3

5

24%

LEVEL 4

6

29%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

19
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

3

9%

LEVEL 2

10

31%

LEVEL 3

8

25%

LEVEL 4

11

34%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

100
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

93

34%

LEVEL 2

80

29%

LEVEL 3

61

22%

LEVEL 4

39

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

113
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

95

32%

LEVEL 2

90

30%

LEVEL 3

69

23%

LEVEL 4

44

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

15
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

27

44%

LEVEL 2

19

31%

LEVEL 3

8

13%

LEVEL 4

7

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

13
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

38

54%

LEVEL 2

20

28%

LEVEL 3

10

14%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

24
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

77

49%

LEVEL 2

56

36%

LEVEL 3

20

13%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

21
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

88

55%

LEVEL 2

50

31%

LEVEL 3

16

10%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

150
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 438

LEVEL 1

139

32%

LEVEL 2

149

34%

LEVEL 3

94

21%

LEVEL 4

56

13%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

164
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 492

LEVEL 1

156

32%

LEVEL 2

172

35%

LEVEL 3

100

20%

LEVEL 4

64

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

68

77%

LEVEL 2

16

18%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

77

85%

LEVEL 2

9

10%

LEVEL 3

4

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

154
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 494

LEVEL 1

182

37%

LEVEL 2

158

32%

LEVEL 3

97

20%

LEVEL 4

57

12%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

169
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 551

LEVEL 1

205

37%

LEVEL 2

177

32%

LEVEL 3

104

19%

LEVEL 4

65

12%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

25

78%

LEVEL 2

7

22%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

28

88%

LEVEL 2

4

13%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

120
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

89

29%

LEVEL 2

101

33%

LEVEL 3

72

23%

LEVEL 4

48

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

126
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

115

32%

LEVEL 2

113

32%

LEVEL 3

78

22%

LEVEL 4

48

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

118

55%

LEVEL 2

64

30%

LEVEL 3

25

12%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

118

52%

LEVEL 2

68

30%

LEVEL 3

26

11%

LEVEL 4

17

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

152
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 521

LEVEL 1

206

40%

LEVEL 2

163

31%

LEVEL 3

96

18%

LEVEL 4

56

11%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.