PAWLING MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

78
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

50

26%

LEVEL 2

67

34%

LEVEL 3

43

22%

LEVEL 4

35

18%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

103
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

41

21%

LEVEL 2

56

28%

LEVEL 3

65

33%

LEVEL 4

38

19%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

40
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

17

17%

LEVEL 2

41

42%

LEVEL 3

21

21%

LEVEL 4

19

19%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

49
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

27

28%

LEVEL 2

22

22%

LEVEL 3

32

33%

LEVEL 4

17

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

38
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

33

34%

LEVEL 2

26

27%

LEVEL 3

22

23%

LEVEL 4

16

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

54
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

14

14%

LEVEL 2

34

33%

LEVEL 3

33

32%

LEVEL 4

21

21%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

61
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

31

22%

LEVEL 2

49

35%

LEVEL 3

33

23%

LEVEL 4

28

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

79
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

24

17%

LEVEL 2

37

26%

LEVEL 3

47

34%

LEVEL 4

32

23%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

15
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

18

38%

LEVEL 2

15

31%

LEVEL 3

8

17%

LEVEL 4

7

15%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

20
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

16

32%

LEVEL 2

14

28%

LEVEL 3

15

30%

LEVEL 4

5

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

76
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

32

19%

LEVEL 2

58

35%

LEVEL 3

42

25%

LEVEL 4

34

20%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

98
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

30

17%

LEVEL 2

44

26%

LEVEL 3

60

35%

LEVEL 4

38

22%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

18

62%

LEVEL 2

9

31%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

11

39%

LEVEL 2

12

43%

LEVEL 3

5

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

77
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

46

25%

LEVEL 2

64

34%

LEVEL 3

42

22%

LEVEL 4

35

19%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

103
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

33

17%

LEVEL 2

54

28%

LEVEL 3

65

34%

LEVEL 4

38

20%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

8

80%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

62
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

25

20%

LEVEL 2

41

32%

LEVEL 3

32

25%

LEVEL 4

30

23%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

73
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

17

13%

LEVEL 2

38

30%

LEVEL 3

38

30%

LEVEL 4

35

27%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

16
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

25

37%

LEVEL 2

26

39%

LEVEL 3

11

16%

LEVEL 4

5

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

24

33%

LEVEL 2

18

25%

LEVEL 3

27

38%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.