PLATTSBURGH CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

116
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

131

36%

LEVEL 2

116

32%

LEVEL 3

68

19%

LEVEL 4

48

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

131
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 386

LEVEL 1

139

36%

LEVEL 2

116

30%

LEVEL 3

83

22%

LEVEL 4

48

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

50
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

57

36%

LEVEL 2

52

33%

LEVEL 3

26

16%

LEVEL 4

24

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

54
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

65

37%

LEVEL 2

55

32%

LEVEL 3

31

18%

LEVEL 4

23

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

66
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

74

36%

LEVEL 2

64

31%

LEVEL 3

42

21%

LEVEL 4

24

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

77
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

74

35%

LEVEL 2

61

29%

LEVEL 3

52

25%

LEVEL 4

25

12%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

13
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

4

22%

LEVEL 3

10

56%

LEVEL 4

3

17%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

10
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

1

7%

LEVEL 2

4

27%

LEVEL 3

4

27%

LEVEL 4

6

40%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

94
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

111

36%

LEVEL 2

102

33%

LEVEL 3

52

17%

LEVEL 4

42

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

113
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 328

LEVEL 1

118

36%

LEVEL 2

97

30%

LEVEL 3

73

22%

LEVEL 4

40

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

13

48%

LEVEL 2

8

30%

LEVEL 3

3

11%

LEVEL 4

3

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

12

39%

LEVEL 2

12

39%

LEVEL 3

5

16%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

110
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

67

24%

LEVEL 2

102

37%

LEVEL 3

65

23%

LEVEL 4

45

16%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

125
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

64

22%

LEVEL 2

104

35%

LEVEL 3

77

26%

LEVEL 4

48

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

64

76%

LEVEL 2

14

17%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

75

81%

LEVEL 2

12

13%

LEVEL 3

6

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

71
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

27

17%

LEVEL 2

65

40%

LEVEL 3

37

23%

LEVEL 4

34

21%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

91
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

37

19%

LEVEL 2

64

33%

LEVEL 3

52

27%

LEVEL 4

39

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

104

52%

LEVEL 2

51

26%

LEVEL 3

31

16%

LEVEL 4

14

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

102

53%

LEVEL 2

52

27%

LEVEL 3

31

16%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

131
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 379

LEVEL 1

133

35%

LEVEL 2

115

30%

LEVEL 3

83

22%

LEVEL 4

48

13%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

6

86%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

112
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

121

35%

LEVEL 2

112

32%

LEVEL 3

65

19%

LEVEL 4

47

14%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

129
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

125

34%

LEVEL 2

109

30%

LEVEL 3

81

22%

LEVEL 4

48

13%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

10

56%

LEVEL 2

4

22%

LEVEL 3

3

17%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

14

61%

LEVEL 2

7

30%

LEVEL 3

2

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.