NORWICH CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

267
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 623

LEVEL 1

175

28%

LEVEL 2

181

29%

LEVEL 3

158

25%

LEVEL 4

109

17%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

247
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 569

LEVEL 1

164

29%

LEVEL 2

158

28%

LEVEL 3

151

27%

LEVEL 4

96

17%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

123
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

77

26%

LEVEL 2

97

33%

LEVEL 3

72

24%

LEVEL 4

51

17%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

122
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

82

28%

LEVEL 2

84

29%

LEVEL 3

74

26%

LEVEL 4

48

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

144
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

98

30%

LEVEL 2

84

26%

LEVEL 3

86

26%

LEVEL 4

58

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

125
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

82

29%

LEVEL 2

74

26%

LEVEL 3

77

27%

LEVEL 4

48

17%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

5

45%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

2

18%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

1

9%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

5

45%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

249
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 550

LEVEL 1

146

27%

LEVEL 2

155

28%

LEVEL 3

150

27%

LEVEL 4

99

18%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

225
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 504

LEVEL 1

141

28%

LEVEL 2

138

27%

LEVEL 3

141

28%

LEVEL 4

84

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

9

47%

LEVEL 2

5

26%

LEVEL 3

4

21%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

6

40%

LEVEL 2

5

33%

LEVEL 3

3

20%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

15

44%

LEVEL 2

12

35%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

5

15%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

12

44%

LEVEL 2

7

26%

LEVEL 3

4

15%

LEVEL 4

4

15%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

257
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 520

LEVEL 1

96

18%

LEVEL 2

167

32%

LEVEL 3

149

29%

LEVEL 4

108

21%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

245
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 481

LEVEL 1

93

19%

LEVEL 2

143

30%

LEVEL 3

149

31%

LEVEL 4

96

20%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

79

77%

LEVEL 2

14

14%

LEVEL 3

9

9%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

71

81%

LEVEL 2

15

17%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

246
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 563

LEVEL 1

161

29%

LEVEL 2

156

28%

LEVEL 3

150

27%

LEVEL 4

96

17%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

131
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

27

13%

LEVEL 2

56

26%

LEVEL 3

68

32%

LEVEL 4

63

29%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

129
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

40

18%

LEVEL 2

49

22%

LEVEL 3

72

33%

LEVEL 4

57

26%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

136
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 409

LEVEL 1

148

36%

LEVEL 2

125

31%

LEVEL 3

90

22%

LEVEL 4

46

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

118
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 351

LEVEL 1

124

35%

LEVEL 2

109

31%

LEVEL 3

79

23%

LEVEL 4

39

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

265
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 610

LEVEL 1

168

28%

LEVEL 2

177

29%

LEVEL 3

157

26%

LEVEL 4

108

18%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

246
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 560

LEVEL 1

158

28%

LEVEL 2

156

28%

LEVEL 3

150

27%

LEVEL 4

96

17%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

7

54%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

6

67%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.