Skip to Content
Main content

THOMAS K BEECHER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

42
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 387

LEVEL 1

262

68%

LEVEL 2

83

21%

LEVEL 3

35

9%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

39
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 364

LEVEL 1

256

70%

LEVEL 2

69

19%

LEVEL 3

32

9%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

16
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

136

69%

LEVEL 2

46

23%

LEVEL 3

14

7%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

13
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

126

74%

LEVEL 2

31

18%

LEVEL 3

10

6%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

26
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

126

67%

LEVEL 2

37

20%

LEVEL 3

21

11%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

26
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

130

67%

LEVEL 2

38

20%

LEVEL 3

22

11%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

57

78%

LEVEL 2

11

15%

LEVEL 3

5

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

53

73%

LEVEL 2

15

21%

LEVEL 3

5

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

30
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

140

61%

LEVEL 2

58

25%

LEVEL 3

24

11%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

26
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

144

66%

LEVEL 2

49

22%

LEVEL 3

21

10%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

54

75%

LEVEL 2

13

18%

LEVEL 3

5

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

48

81%

LEVEL 2

5

8%

LEVEL 3

5

8%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

42
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

191

61%

LEVEL 2

79

25%

LEVEL 3

35

11%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

38
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

201

66%

LEVEL 2

66

22%

LEVEL 3

31

10%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

71

95%

LEVEL 2

4

5%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

55

93%

LEVEL 2

3

5%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

15
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

29

47%

LEVEL 2

18

29%

LEVEL 3

10

16%

LEVEL 4

5

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

38

60%

LEVEL 2

15

24%

LEVEL 3

8

13%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

233

72%

LEVEL 2

65

20%

LEVEL 3

25

8%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

218

72%

LEVEL 2

54

18%

LEVEL 3

24

8%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.