GEORGE WASHINGTON MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

78
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 458

LEVEL 1

286

62%

LEVEL 2

94

21%

LEVEL 3

56

12%

LEVEL 4

22

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

83
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 446

LEVEL 1

256

57%

LEVEL 2

107

24%

LEVEL 3

61

14%

LEVEL 4

22

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

35
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

135

62%

LEVEL 2

47

22%

LEVEL 3

25

12%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

33
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

126

62%

LEVEL 2

44

22%

LEVEL 3

25

12%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

43
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

151

63%

LEVEL 2

47

20%

LEVEL 3

31

13%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

50
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

130

53%

LEVEL 2

63

26%

LEVEL 3

36

15%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

36

62%

LEVEL 2

14

24%

LEVEL 3

8

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

12
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

31

58%

LEVEL 2

10

19%

LEVEL 3

8

15%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

55
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

120

52%

LEVEL 2

56

24%

LEVEL 3

35

15%

LEVEL 4

20

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

48
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

103

49%

LEVEL 2

60

28%

LEVEL 3

33

16%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

114

77%

LEVEL 2

21

14%

LEVEL 3

11

7%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

21
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

109

67%

LEVEL 2

33

20%

LEVEL 3

18

11%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

77
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 390

LEVEL 1

224

57%

LEVEL 2

89

23%

LEVEL 3

55

14%

LEVEL 4

22

6%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

83
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 372

LEVEL 1

186

50%

LEVEL 2

103

28%

LEVEL 3

61

16%

LEVEL 4

22

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

62

91%

LEVEL 2

5

7%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

70

95%

LEVEL 2

4

5%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

83
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 410

LEVEL 1

222

54%

LEVEL 2

105

26%

LEVEL 3

61

15%

LEVEL 4

22

5%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

34

94%

LEVEL 2

2

6%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

41

38%

LEVEL 2

27

25%

LEVEL 3

20

19%

LEVEL 4

20

19%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

25

29%

LEVEL 2

27

31%

LEVEL 3

22

26%

LEVEL 4

12

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 350

LEVEL 1

245

70%

LEVEL 2

67

19%

LEVEL 3

36

10%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

49
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

231

64%

LEVEL 2

80

22%

LEVEL 3

39

11%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

83
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 439

LEVEL 1

250

57%

LEVEL 2

106

24%

LEVEL 3

61

14%

LEVEL 4

22

5%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

6

86%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.