Skip to Content
Main content

DUNKIRK MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

62
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 395

LEVEL 1

207

52%

LEVEL 2

126

32%

LEVEL 3

46

12%

LEVEL 4

16

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

90
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 392

LEVEL 1

192

49%

LEVEL 2

110

28%

LEVEL 3

60

15%

LEVEL 4

30

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

28
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

97

53%

LEVEL 2

59

32%

LEVEL 3

22

12%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

48
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

89

47%

LEVEL 2

52

28%

LEVEL 3

38

20%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

34
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

110

52%

LEVEL 2

67

32%

LEVEL 3

24

11%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

42
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

103

51%

LEVEL 2

58

29%

LEVEL 3

22

11%

LEVEL 4

20

10%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

15

63%

LEVEL 2

5

21%

LEVEL 3

4

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

41
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

49

31%

LEVEL 2

69

43%

LEVEL 3

29

18%

LEVEL 4

12

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

58
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

46

30%

LEVEL 2

49

32%

LEVEL 3

33

22%

LEVEL 4

25

16%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

12

75%

LEVEL 2

3

19%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

15
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

141

69%

LEVEL 2

48

24%

LEVEL 3

13

6%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

27
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

119

60%

LEVEL 2

54

27%

LEVEL 3

23

12%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

62
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 357

LEVEL 1

173

48%

LEVEL 2

122

34%

LEVEL 3

46

13%

LEVEL 4

16

4%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

90
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 361

LEVEL 1

166

46%

LEVEL 2

105

29%

LEVEL 3

60

17%

LEVEL 4

30

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

34

89%

LEVEL 2

4

11%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

26

84%

LEVEL 2

5

16%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

62
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

136

43%

LEVEL 2

117

37%

LEVEL 3

46

15%

LEVEL 4

16

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

87
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 329

LEVEL 1

140

43%

LEVEL 2

102

31%

LEVEL 3

57

17%

LEVEL 4

30

9%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

71

89%

LEVEL 2

9

11%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

52

83%

LEVEL 2

8

13%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

41

32%

LEVEL 2

58

45%

LEVEL 3

22

17%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

28

27%

LEVEL 2

36

35%

LEVEL 3

24

23%

LEVEL 4

16

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

166

62%

LEVEL 2

68

25%

LEVEL 3

24

9%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

164

57%

LEVEL 2

74

26%

LEVEL 3

36

13%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

61
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 385

LEVEL 1

201

52%

LEVEL 2

123

32%

LEVEL 3

45

12%

LEVEL 4

16

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

88
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 383

LEVEL 1

187

49%

LEVEL 2

108

28%

LEVEL 3

58

15%

LEVEL 4

30

8%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

1
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

6

60%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

5

56%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

62
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 372

LEVEL 1

188

51%

LEVEL 2

122

33%

LEVEL 3

46

12%

LEVEL 4

16

4%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

89
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 379

LEVEL 1

181

48%

LEVEL 2

109

29%

LEVEL 3

59

16%

LEVEL 4

30

8%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

19

83%

LEVEL 2

4

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

11

85%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.