SOUTHWESTERN CSD AT JAMESTOWN GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

256
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 540

LEVEL 1

111

21%

LEVEL 2

173

32%

LEVEL 3

149

28%

LEVEL 4

107

20%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

278
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 585

LEVEL 1

134

23%

LEVEL 2

173

30%

LEVEL 3

161

28%

LEVEL 4

117

20%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

109
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

58

25%

LEVEL 2

67

29%

LEVEL 3

69

29%

LEVEL 4

40

17%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

118
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

70

26%

LEVEL 2

78

29%

LEVEL 3

67

25%

LEVEL 4

51

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

147
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 306

LEVEL 1

53

17%

LEVEL 2

106

35%

LEVEL 3

80

26%

LEVEL 4

67

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

160
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

64

20%

LEVEL 2

95

30%

LEVEL 3

94

29%

LEVEL 4

66

21%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

8

40%

LEVEL 2

8

40%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

3

15%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

12

46%

LEVEL 2

8

31%

LEVEL 3

3

12%

LEVEL 4

3

12%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

7

50%

LEVEL 3

5

36%

LEVEL 4

2

14%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

1

7%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

3

21%

LEVEL 4

5

36%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

232
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 477

LEVEL 1

90

19%

LEVEL 2

155

32%

LEVEL 3

134

28%

LEVEL 4

98

21%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

252
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 512

LEVEL 1

106

21%

LEVEL 2

154

30%

LEVEL 3

146

29%

LEVEL 4

106

21%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

9

39%

LEVEL 2

3

13%

LEVEL 3

8

35%

LEVEL 4

3

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

10

38%

LEVEL 2

6

23%

LEVEL 3

8

31%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

250
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 466

LEVEL 1

60

13%

LEVEL 2

156

33%

LEVEL 3

146

31%

LEVEL 4

104

22%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

269
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 498

LEVEL 1

72

14%

LEVEL 2

157

32%

LEVEL 3

153

31%

LEVEL 4

116

23%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

51

69%

LEVEL 2

17

23%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

62

71%

LEVEL 2

16

18%

LEVEL 3

8

9%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

255
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 534

LEVEL 1

110

21%

LEVEL 2

169

32%

LEVEL 3

149

28%

LEVEL 4

106

20%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

4

67%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

187
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

34

11%

LEVEL 2

97

31%

LEVEL 3

104

33%

LEVEL 4

83

26%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

194
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

46

14%

LEVEL 2

99

29%

LEVEL 3

98

29%

LEVEL 4

96

28%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

69
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

77

35%

LEVEL 2

76

34%

LEVEL 3

45

20%

LEVEL 4

24

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

84
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

88

36%

LEVEL 2

74

30%

LEVEL 3

63

26%

LEVEL 4

21

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.