WHITNEY POINT CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

241
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 526

LEVEL 1

138

26%

LEVEL 2

147

28%

LEVEL 3

147

28%

LEVEL 4

94

18%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

257
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 590

LEVEL 1

169

29%

LEVEL 2

164

28%

LEVEL 3

166

28%

LEVEL 4

91

15%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

123
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

64

25%

LEVEL 2

73

28%

LEVEL 3

71

27%

LEVEL 4

52

20%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

131
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

86

28%

LEVEL 2

86

28%

LEVEL 3

86

28%

LEVEL 4

45

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

118
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

74

28%

LEVEL 2

74

28%

LEVEL 3

76

29%

LEVEL 4

42

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

126
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

83

29%

LEVEL 2

78

27%

LEVEL 3

80

28%

LEVEL 4

46

16%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

5

56%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

67%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

237
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 507

LEVEL 1

133

26%

LEVEL 2

137

27%

LEVEL 3

146

29%

LEVEL 4

91

18%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

253
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 572

LEVEL 1

164

29%

LEVEL 2

155

27%

LEVEL 3

164

29%

LEVEL 4

89

16%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

234
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 437

LEVEL 1

73

17%

LEVEL 2

130

30%

LEVEL 3

142

32%

LEVEL 4

92

21%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

250
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 477

LEVEL 1

84

18%

LEVEL 2

143

30%

LEVEL 3

160

34%

LEVEL 4

90

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

65

73%

LEVEL 2

17

19%

LEVEL 3

5

6%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

85

75%

LEVEL 2

21

19%

LEVEL 3

6

5%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

122
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

30

15%

LEVEL 2

42

22%

LEVEL 3

62

32%

LEVEL 4

60

31%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

128
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

38

18%

LEVEL 2

48

22%

LEVEL 3

73

34%

LEVEL 4

55

26%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

119
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

108

33%

LEVEL 2

105

32%

LEVEL 3

85

26%

LEVEL 4

34

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

129
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 376

LEVEL 1

131

35%

LEVEL 2

116

31%

LEVEL 3

93

25%

LEVEL 4

36

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

236
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 508

LEVEL 1

130

26%

LEVEL 2

142

28%

LEVEL 3

142

28%

LEVEL 4

94

19%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

249
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 563

LEVEL 1

160

28%

LEVEL 2

154

27%

LEVEL 3

161

29%

LEVEL 4

88

16%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

8

44%

LEVEL 2

5

28%

LEVEL 3

5

28%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

8
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

9

33%

LEVEL 2

10

37%

LEVEL 3

5

19%

LEVEL 4

3

11%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.