Skip to Content
Main content

CUBA-RUSHFORD CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

162
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 329

LEVEL 1

61

19%

LEVEL 2

106

32%

LEVEL 3

116

35%

LEVEL 4

46

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

169
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

51

16%

LEVEL 2

90

29%

LEVEL 3

103

33%

LEVEL 4

66

21%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

74
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

24

16%

LEVEL 2

55

36%

LEVEL 3

56

37%

LEVEL 4

18

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

82
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

26

17%

LEVEL 2

45

29%

LEVEL 3

48

31%

LEVEL 4

34

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

88
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

37

21%

LEVEL 2

51

29%

LEVEL 3

60

34%

LEVEL 4

28

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

87
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

25

16%

LEVEL 2

45

29%

LEVEL 3

55

35%

LEVEL 4

32

20%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

155
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

59

19%

LEVEL 2

100

32%

LEVEL 3

111

35%

LEVEL 4

44

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

161
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

48

16%

LEVEL 2

86

29%

LEVEL 3

99

34%

LEVEL 4

62

21%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

155
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

32

12%

LEVEL 2

86

32%

LEVEL 3

110

40%

LEVEL 4

45

16%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

165
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

19

7%

LEVEL 2

75

29%

LEVEL 3

99

38%

LEVEL 4

66

25%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

29

52%

LEVEL 2

20

36%

LEVEL 3

6

11%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

32

63%

LEVEL 2

15

29%

LEVEL 3

4

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

76
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

22

17%

LEVEL 2

31

24%

LEVEL 3

50

39%

LEVEL 4

26

20%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

90
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

11

8%

LEVEL 2

32

24%

LEVEL 3

55

41%

LEVEL 4

35

26%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

86
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

39

20%

LEVEL 2

75

38%

LEVEL 3

66

33%

LEVEL 4

20

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

79
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

40

23%

LEVEL 2

58

33%

LEVEL 3

48

27%

LEVEL 4

31

18%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

161
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 324

LEVEL 1

60

19%

LEVEL 2

103

32%

LEVEL 3

115

35%

LEVEL 4

46

14%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

167
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

49

16%

LEVEL 2

89

29%

LEVEL 3

101

33%

LEVEL 4

66

22%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.