Skip to Content
Main content

CALEDONIA-MUMFORD CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

173
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

49

17%

LEVEL 2

64

22%

LEVEL 3

91

32%

LEVEL 4

82

29%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

190
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

53

17%

LEVEL 2

60

20%

LEVEL 3

91

30%

LEVEL 4

99

33%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

83
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

29

19%

LEVEL 2

38

25%

LEVEL 3

44

29%

LEVEL 4

39

26%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

97
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

31

19%

LEVEL 2

33

20%

LEVEL 3

48

30%

LEVEL 4

49

30%

MALE

PROFICIENT

90
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

20

15%

LEVEL 2

26

19%

LEVEL 3

47

35%

LEVEL 4

43

32%

MALE

PROFICIENT

93
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

22

15%

LEVEL 2

27

19%

LEVEL 3

43

30%

LEVEL 4

50

35%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

164
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

42

16%

LEVEL 2

61

23%

LEVEL 3

85

32%

LEVEL 4

79

30%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

185
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

43

15%

LEVEL 2

59

21%

LEVEL 3

87

30%

LEVEL 4

98

34%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

2

25%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

163
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

21

9%

LEVEL 2

52

22%

LEVEL 3

83

35%

LEVEL 4

80

34%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

179
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

24

10%

LEVEL 2

44

18%

LEVEL 3

83

34%

LEVEL 4

96

39%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

28

56%

LEVEL 2

12

24%

LEVEL 3

8

16%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

29

52%

LEVEL 2

16

29%

LEVEL 3

8

14%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

105
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

25

15%

LEVEL 2

36

22%

LEVEL 3

52

31%

LEVEL 4

53

32%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

125
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

26

14%

LEVEL 2

41

21%

LEVEL 3

53

28%

LEVEL 4

72

38%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

68
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

24

20%

LEVEL 2

28

23%

LEVEL 3

39

33%

LEVEL 4

29

24%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

65
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

27

24%

LEVEL 2

19

17%

LEVEL 3

38

34%

LEVEL 4

27

24%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.