Skip to Content
Main content

PS 69 VINCENT D GRIPPO SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

302
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 405

LEVEL 1

32

8%

LEVEL 2

71

18%

LEVEL 3

112

28%

LEVEL 4

190

47%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

283
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 373

LEVEL 1

30

8%

LEVEL 2

60

16%

LEVEL 3

102

27%

LEVEL 4

181

49%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

146
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

13

7%

LEVEL 2

36

18%

LEVEL 3

59

30%

LEVEL 4

87

45%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

140
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

13

7%

LEVEL 2

29

16%

LEVEL 3

53

29%

LEVEL 4

87

48%

MALE

PROFICIENT

156
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

19

9%

LEVEL 2

35

17%

LEVEL 3

53

25%

LEVEL 4

103

49%

MALE

PROFICIENT

143
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

17

9%

LEVEL 2

31

16%

LEVEL 3

49

26%

LEVEL 4

94

49%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

287
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 372

LEVEL 1

26

7%

LEVEL 2

59

16%

LEVEL 3

104

28%

LEVEL 4

183

49%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

266
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

22

6%

LEVEL 2

53

16%

LEVEL 3

90

26%

LEVEL 4

176

52%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

9
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

5

31%

LEVEL 3

4

25%

LEVEL 4

5

31%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

5

31%

LEVEL 2

3

19%

LEVEL 3

7

44%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

288
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 350

LEVEL 1

15

4%

LEVEL 2

47

13%

LEVEL 3

106

30%

LEVEL 4

182

52%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

270
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 331

LEVEL 1

10

3%

LEVEL 2

51

15%

LEVEL 3

95

29%

LEVEL 4

175

53%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

17

31%

LEVEL 2

24

44%

LEVEL 3

6

11%

LEVEL 4

8

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

20

48%

LEVEL 2

9

21%

LEVEL 3

7

17%

LEVEL 4

6

14%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

220
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

28

11%

LEVEL 3

58

23%

LEVEL 4

162

65%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

223
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

7

3%

LEVEL 2

25

10%

LEVEL 3

65

25%

LEVEL 4

158

62%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

82
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

29

19%

LEVEL 2

43

28%

LEVEL 3

54

35%

LEVEL 4

28

18%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

60
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

23

19%

LEVEL 2

35

30%

LEVEL 3

37

31%

LEVEL 4

23

19%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

2

18%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

7

64%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

3

60%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

293
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 394

LEVEL 1

30

8%

LEVEL 2

71

18%

LEVEL 3

110

28%

LEVEL 4

183

46%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

279
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 368

LEVEL 1

29

8%

LEVEL 2

60

16%

LEVEL 3

101

27%

LEVEL 4

178

48%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

291
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 385

LEVEL 1

30

8%

LEVEL 2

64

17%

LEVEL 3

109

28%

LEVEL 4

182

47%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

11
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

2

10%

LEVEL 2

7

35%

LEVEL 3

3

15%

LEVEL 4

8

40%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.