EXCELLENCE BOYS CHAR SCH-BED STUY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

283
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 432

LEVEL 1

61

14%

LEVEL 2

88

20%

LEVEL 3

139

32%

LEVEL 4

144

33%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

289
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 422

LEVEL 1

40

9%

LEVEL 2

93

22%

LEVEL 3

121

29%

LEVEL 4

168

40%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MALE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MALE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

13
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

7

54%

LEVEL 4

6

46%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

14
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

3

19%

LEVEL 4

11

69%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

3

50%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

6
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

4

44%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

229
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

57

16%

LEVEL 2

80

22%

LEVEL 3

114

31%

LEVEL 4

115

31%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

228
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

34

10%

LEVEL 2

80

23%

LEVEL 3

101

30%

LEVEL 4

127

37%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

32
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

3

8%

LEVEL 2

4

10%

LEVEL 3

14

36%

LEVEL 4

18

46%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

37
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

4

9%

LEVEL 2

5

11%

LEVEL 3

13

28%

LEVEL 4

24

52%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

239
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

36

11%

LEVEL 2

67

20%

LEVEL 3

113

33%

LEVEL 4

126

37%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

241
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

20

6%

LEVEL 2

64

20%

LEVEL 3

93

29%

LEVEL 4

148

46%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

44
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

25

28%

LEVEL 2

21

23%

LEVEL 3

26

29%

LEVEL 4

18

20%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

48
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

20

21%

LEVEL 2

29

30%

LEVEL 3

28

29%

LEVEL 4

20

21%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

275
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 422

LEVEL 1

61

14%

LEVEL 2

86

20%

LEVEL 3

134

32%

LEVEL 4

141

33%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

284
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 411

LEVEL 1

40

10%

LEVEL 2

87

21%

LEVEL 3

118

29%

LEVEL 4

166

40%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

8
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

5

50%

LEVEL 4

3

30%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

5
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

55%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

2

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

61
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

9

10%

LEVEL 2

17

20%

LEVEL 3

33

38%

LEVEL 4

28

32%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

83
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

6

6%

LEVEL 2

16

15%

LEVEL 3

30

29%

LEVEL 4

53

50%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

222
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

52

15%

LEVEL 2

71

21%

LEVEL 3

106

31%

LEVEL 4

116

34%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

206
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

34

11%

LEVEL 2

77

24%

LEVEL 3

91

29%

LEVEL 4

115

36%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

269
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 403

LEVEL 1

57

14%

LEVEL 2

77

19%

LEVEL 3

135

33%

LEVEL 4

134

33%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

14
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

4

14%

LEVEL 2

11

38%

LEVEL 3

4

14%

LEVEL 4

10

34%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.