Skip to Content
Main content

PS/IS 208 GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

212
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 466

LEVEL 1

106

23%

LEVEL 2

148

32%

LEVEL 3

104

22%

LEVEL 4

108

23%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

268
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 478

LEVEL 1

79

17%

LEVEL 2

131

27%

LEVEL 3

139

29%

LEVEL 4

129

27%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

106
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

45

20%

LEVEL 2

72

32%

LEVEL 3

51

23%

LEVEL 4

55

25%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

140
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

31

13%

LEVEL 2

60

26%

LEVEL 3

74

32%

LEVEL 4

66

29%

MALE

PROFICIENT

106
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

61

25%

LEVEL 2

76

31%

LEVEL 3

53

22%

LEVEL 4

53

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

128
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

48

19%

LEVEL 2

71

29%

LEVEL 3

65

26%

LEVEL 4

63

26%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

4

44%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

4
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

2

25%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

24
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

8

24%

LEVEL 3

7

21%

LEVEL 4

17

52%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

34
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

3%

LEVEL 3

18

51%

LEVEL 4

16

46%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

144
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

85

24%

LEVEL 2

123

35%

LEVEL 3

73

21%

LEVEL 4

71

20%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

184
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

65

18%

LEVEL 2

105

30%

LEVEL 3

95

27%

LEVEL 4

89

25%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

36
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

11

18%

LEVEL 2

13

22%

LEVEL 3

19

32%

LEVEL 4

17

28%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

38
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

12

18%

LEVEL 2

18

26%

LEVEL 3

18

26%

LEVEL 4

20

29%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

197
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 375

LEVEL 1

57

15%

LEVEL 2

121

32%

LEVEL 3

93

25%

LEVEL 4

104

28%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

257
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 401

LEVEL 1

37

9%

LEVEL 2

107

27%

LEVEL 3

133

33%

LEVEL 4

124

31%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

49

54%

LEVEL 2

27

30%

LEVEL 3

11

12%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

42

55%

LEVEL 2

24

31%

LEVEL 3

6

8%

LEVEL 4

5

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

116
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

50

20%

LEVEL 2

81

33%

LEVEL 3

54

22%

LEVEL 4

62

25%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

175
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

37

13%

LEVEL 2

71

25%

LEVEL 3

85

30%

LEVEL 4

90

32%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

96
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

56

26%

LEVEL 2

67

31%

LEVEL 3

50

23%

LEVEL 4

46

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

93
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

42

22%

LEVEL 2

60

31%

LEVEL 3

54

28%

LEVEL 4

39

20%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

264
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 472

LEVEL 1

78

17%

LEVEL 2

130

28%

LEVEL 3

136

29%

LEVEL 4

128

27%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.