URBAN ASSEMBLY BRONX OF LETTERS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

25
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

158

66%

LEVEL 2

57

24%

LEVEL 3

18

8%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

34
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

160

67%

LEVEL 2

46

19%

LEVEL 3

27

11%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

16
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

69

58%

LEVEL 2

35

29%

LEVEL 3

10

8%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

21
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

70

61%

LEVEL 2

23

20%

LEVEL 3

16

14%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

9
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

89

74%

LEVEL 2

22

18%

LEVEL 3

8

7%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

13
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

90

71%

LEVEL 2

23

18%

LEVEL 3

11

9%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

12
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

61

65%

LEVEL 2

21

22%

LEVEL 3

10

11%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

13
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

60

69%

LEVEL 2

14

16%

LEVEL 3

10

11%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

91

66%

LEVEL 2

36

26%

LEVEL 3

7

5%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

20
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

92

64%

LEVEL 2

31

22%

LEVEL 3

16

11%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

24
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

96

57%

LEVEL 2

48

29%

LEVEL 3

18

11%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

32
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

101

59%

LEVEL 2

37

22%

LEVEL 3

25

15%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

62

86%

LEVEL 2

9

13%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

59

84%

LEVEL 2

9

13%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

24
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

131

64%

LEVEL 2

51

25%

LEVEL 3

17

8%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

30
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

136

67%

LEVEL 2

38

19%

LEVEL 3

23

11%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

27

79%

LEVEL 2

6

18%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

24

67%

LEVEL 2

8

22%

LEVEL 3

4

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

6

67%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

152

66%

LEVEL 2

55

24%

LEVEL 3

17

7%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

23
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

140

66%

LEVEL 2

50

23%

LEVEL 3

16

8%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

30
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

137

68%

LEVEL 2

35

17%

LEVEL 3

23

11%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

18

67%

LEVEL 2

7

26%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

23

61%

LEVEL 2

11

29%

LEVEL 3

4

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.