Skip to Content
Main content

MARTIN ROAD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

64
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 388

LEVEL 1

221

57%

LEVEL 2

103

27%

LEVEL 3

51

13%

LEVEL 4

13

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

85
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 424

LEVEL 1

234

55%

LEVEL 2

105

25%

LEVEL 3

64

15%

LEVEL 4

21

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

26
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

108

57%

LEVEL 2

54

29%

LEVEL 3

21

11%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

29
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

116

59%

LEVEL 2

50

26%

LEVEL 3

25

13%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

38
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

113

57%

LEVEL 2

49

25%

LEVEL 3

30

15%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

56
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

118

52%

LEVEL 2

55

24%

LEVEL 3

39

17%

LEVEL 4

17

7%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

7

47%

LEVEL 2

4

27%

LEVEL 3

4

27%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

10

48%

LEVEL 2

5

24%

LEVEL 3

3

14%

LEVEL 4

3

14%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

49
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

119

50%

LEVEL 2

68

29%

LEVEL 3

37

16%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

61
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

117

47%

LEVEL 2

71

29%

LEVEL 3

45

18%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

40

67%

LEVEL 2

17

28%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

50

69%

LEVEL 2

12

17%

LEVEL 3

9

13%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

43

70%

LEVEL 2

12

20%

LEVEL 3

5

8%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

45

70%

LEVEL 2

12

19%

LEVEL 3

6

9%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

60
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 323

LEVEL 1

169

52%

LEVEL 2

94

29%

LEVEL 3

48

15%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

79
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

169

49%

LEVEL 2

97

28%

LEVEL 3

61

18%

LEVEL 4

18

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

52

80%

LEVEL 2

9

14%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

65

82%

LEVEL 2

8

10%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

61
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

126

46%

LEVEL 2

85

31%

LEVEL 3

48

18%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

75
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

159

50%

LEVEL 2

86

27%

LEVEL 3

55

17%

LEVEL 4

20

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

95

82%

LEVEL 2

18

16%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

10
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

75

72%

LEVEL 2

19

18%

LEVEL 3

9

9%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

15

41%

LEVEL 2

11

30%

LEVEL 3

8

22%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

16
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

30

45%

LEVEL 2

20

30%

LEVEL 3

14

21%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 351

LEVEL 1

206

59%

LEVEL 2

92

26%

LEVEL 3

43

12%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

69
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 358

LEVEL 1

204

57%

LEVEL 2

85

24%

LEVEL 3

50

14%

LEVEL 4

19

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

85
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 418

LEVEL 1

229

55%

LEVEL 2

104

25%

LEVEL 3

64

15%

LEVEL 4

21

5%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

5

83%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.