Skip to Content
Main content

MOTT HALL II GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

125
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

32

13%

LEVEL 2

91

37%

LEVEL 3

75

30%

LEVEL 4

50

20%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

116
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

61

23%

LEVEL 2

84

32%

LEVEL 3

82

31%

LEVEL 4

34

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

64
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

14

12%

LEVEL 2

39

33%

LEVEL 3

43

37%

LEVEL 4

21

18%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

53
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

29

24%

LEVEL 2

40

33%

LEVEL 3

38

31%

LEVEL 4

15

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

61
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

18

14%

LEVEL 2

52

40%

LEVEL 3

32

24%

LEVEL 4

29

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

63
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

32

23%

LEVEL 2

44

32%

LEVEL 3

44

32%

LEVEL 4

19

14%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

11
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

21%

LEVEL 3

3

21%

LEVEL 4

8

57%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

9
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

2

17%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

7

58%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

28
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

18

38%

LEVEL 3

8

17%

LEVEL 4

20

43%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

26
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

2

5%

LEVEL 2

14

33%

LEVEL 3

13

31%

LEVEL 4

13

31%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

24
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

9

14%

LEVEL 2

33

50%

LEVEL 3

19

29%

LEVEL 4

5

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

32
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

17

24%

LEVEL 2

22

31%

LEVEL 3

28

39%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

50
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

22

20%

LEVEL 2

36

33%

LEVEL 3

37

34%

LEVEL 4

13

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

40
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

39

31%

LEVEL 2

45

36%

LEVEL 3

34

27%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

112
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

17

8%

LEVEL 2

75

37%

LEVEL 3

67

33%

LEVEL 4

45

22%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

107
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

41

19%

LEVEL 2

71

32%

LEVEL 3

76

35%

LEVEL 4

31

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

15

34%

LEVEL 2

16

36%

LEVEL 3

8

18%

LEVEL 4

5

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

20

48%

LEVEL 2

13

31%

LEVEL 3

6

14%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

123
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

30

12%

LEVEL 2

90

37%

LEVEL 3

74

30%

LEVEL 4

49

20%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

113
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

56

22%

LEVEL 2

81

32%

LEVEL 3

81

32%

LEVEL 4

32

13%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

5

45%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

2

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

59
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

4

4%

LEVEL 2

30

32%

LEVEL 3

24

26%

LEVEL 4

35

38%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

52
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

10

11%

LEVEL 2

28

31%

LEVEL 3

31

34%

LEVEL 4

21

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

66
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

28

18%

LEVEL 2

61

39%

LEVEL 3

51

33%

LEVEL 4

15

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

64
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

51

30%

LEVEL 2

56

33%

LEVEL 3

51

30%

LEVEL 4

13

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

118
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

24

11%

LEVEL 2

78

35%

LEVEL 3

71

32%

LEVEL 4

47

21%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

111
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

56

23%

LEVEL 2

79

32%

LEVEL 3

78

32%

LEVEL 4

33

13%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

7
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

8

29%

LEVEL 2

13

46%

LEVEL 3

4

14%

LEVEL 4

3

11%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

5

33%

LEVEL 2

5

33%

LEVEL 3

4

27%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.