UNION VALE MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

196
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 439

LEVEL 1

87

20%

LEVEL 2

156

36%

LEVEL 3

130

30%

LEVEL 4

66

15%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

232
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 485

LEVEL 1

82

17%

LEVEL 2

171

35%

LEVEL 3

136

28%

LEVEL 4

96

20%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

104
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

42

18%

LEVEL 2

82

36%

LEVEL 3

72

32%

LEVEL 4

32

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

117
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

42

18%

LEVEL 2

81

34%

LEVEL 3

68

28%

LEVEL 4

49

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

92
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

45

21%

LEVEL 2

74

35%

LEVEL 3

58

27%

LEVEL 4

34

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

115
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

40

16%

LEVEL 2

90

37%

LEVEL 3

68

28%

LEVEL 4

47

19%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

10
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

5

23%

LEVEL 2

7

32%

LEVEL 3

7

32%

LEVEL 4

3

14%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

12
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

3

14%

LEVEL 2

6

29%

LEVEL 3

4

19%

LEVEL 4

8

38%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

12
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

3

17%

LEVEL 2

3

17%

LEVEL 3

7

39%

LEVEL 4

5

28%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

14
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

22%

LEVEL 3

7

39%

LEVEL 4

7

39%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

138
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

60

20%

LEVEL 2

104

34%

LEVEL 3

94

31%

LEVEL 4

44

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

169
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 343

LEVEL 1

55

16%

LEVEL 2

119

35%

LEVEL 3

99

29%

LEVEL 4

70

20%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

6

26%

LEVEL 2

10

43%

LEVEL 3

5

22%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

11

39%

LEVEL 2

10

36%

LEVEL 3

3

11%

LEVEL 4

4

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

29
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

13

18%

LEVEL 2

32

43%

LEVEL 3

17

23%

LEVEL 4

12

16%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

30
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

13

17%

LEVEL 2

32

43%

LEVEL 3

23

31%

LEVEL 4

7

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

184
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 374

LEVEL 1

53

14%

LEVEL 2

137

37%

LEVEL 3

121

32%

LEVEL 4

63

17%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

220
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 413

LEVEL 1

45

11%

LEVEL 2

148

36%

LEVEL 3

126

31%

LEVEL 4

94

23%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

34

52%

LEVEL 2

19

29%

LEVEL 3

9

14%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

37

51%

LEVEL 2

23

32%

LEVEL 3

10

14%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

168
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

69

19%

LEVEL 2

125

35%

LEVEL 3

110

30%

LEVEL 4

58

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

210
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 394

LEVEL 1

54

14%

LEVEL 2

130

33%

LEVEL 3

121

31%

LEVEL 4

89

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

18

23%

LEVEL 2

31

40%

LEVEL 3

20

26%

LEVEL 4

8

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

28

31%

LEVEL 2

41

45%

LEVEL 3

15

16%

LEVEL 4

7

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.