KIPP INFINITY CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

429
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 545

LEVEL 1

38

7%

LEVEL 2

78

14%

LEVEL 3

145

27%

LEVEL 4

284

52%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

445
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 535

LEVEL 1

29

5%

LEVEL 2

61

11%

LEVEL 3

118

22%

LEVEL 4

327

61%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

225
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

14

5%

LEVEL 2

36

13%

LEVEL 3

68

25%

LEVEL 4

157

57%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

230
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

12

4%

LEVEL 2

28

10%

LEVEL 3

53

20%

LEVEL 4

177

66%

MALE

PROFICIENT

204
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

24

9%

LEVEL 2

42

16%

LEVEL 3

77

29%

LEVEL 4

127

47%

MALE

PROFICIENT

215
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

17

6%

LEVEL 2

33

12%

LEVEL 3

65

25%

LEVEL 4

150

57%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

4
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

3

43%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

5
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

4

67%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

117
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

12

8%

LEVEL 2

26

17%

LEVEL 3

51

33%

LEVEL 4

66

43%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

137
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

10

6%

LEVEL 2

18

11%

LEVEL 3

42

25%

LEVEL 4

95

58%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

304
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 377

LEVEL 1

24

6%

LEVEL 2

49

13%

LEVEL 3

91

24%

LEVEL 4

213

56%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

299
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 359

LEVEL 1

19

5%

LEVEL 2

41

11%

LEVEL 3

70

19%

LEVEL 4

229

64%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

358
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 398

LEVEL 1

11

3%

LEVEL 2

29

7%

LEVEL 3

105

26%

LEVEL 4

253

64%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

357
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 396

LEVEL 1

10

3%

LEVEL 2

29

7%

LEVEL 3

74

19%

LEVEL 4

283

71%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

71
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

27

18%

LEVEL 2

49

33%

LEVEL 3

40

27%

LEVEL 4

31

21%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

88
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

19

14%

LEVEL 2

32

23%

LEVEL 3

44

32%

LEVEL 4

44

32%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

396
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 496

LEVEL 1

33

7%

LEVEL 2

67

14%

LEVEL 3

125

25%

LEVEL 4

271

55%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

411
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 483

LEVEL 1

25

5%

LEVEL 2

47

10%

LEVEL 3

102

21%

LEVEL 4

309

64%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

33
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

5

10%

LEVEL 2

11

22%

LEVEL 3

20

41%

LEVEL 4

13

27%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

34
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

4

8%

LEVEL 2

14

27%

LEVEL 3

16

31%

LEVEL 4

18

35%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

3

8%

LEVEL 2

4

11%

LEVEL 3

11

31%

LEVEL 4

18

50%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

2

4%

LEVEL 2

2

4%

LEVEL 3

11

23%

LEVEL 4

33

69%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

400
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 509

LEVEL 1

35

7%

LEVEL 2

74

15%

LEVEL 3

134

26%

LEVEL 4

266

52%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

401
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 487

LEVEL 1

27

6%

LEVEL 2

59

12%

LEVEL 3

107

22%

LEVEL 4

294

60%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

370
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 475

LEVEL 1

35

7%

LEVEL 2

70

15%

LEVEL 3

126

27%

LEVEL 4

244

51%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

59
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

3

4%

LEVEL 2

8

11%

LEVEL 3

19

27%

LEVEL 4

40

57%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.