WASHINGTON HEIGHTS ACADEMY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

174
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

23

9%

LEVEL 2

62

24%

LEVEL 3

96

37%

LEVEL 4

78

30%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

208
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

10

4%

LEVEL 2

60

22%

LEVEL 3

106

38%

LEVEL 4

102

37%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

104
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

13

9%

LEVEL 2

35

23%

LEVEL 3

59

39%

LEVEL 4

45

30%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

110
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

40

26%

LEVEL 3

52

34%

LEVEL 4

58

37%

MALE

PROFICIENT

70
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

10

9%

LEVEL 2

27

25%

LEVEL 3

37

35%

LEVEL 4

33

31%

MALE

PROFICIENT

98
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

5

4%

LEVEL 2

20

16%

LEVEL 3

54

44%

LEVEL 4

44

36%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

3

60%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

4

67%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

5
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

60%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

163
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

22

9%

LEVEL 2

57

24%

LEVEL 3

89

37%

LEVEL 4

74

31%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

193
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

10

4%

LEVEL 2

59

23%

LEVEL 3

98

37%

LEVEL 4

95

36%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

165
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

18

8%

LEVEL 2

56

23%

LEVEL 3

90

38%

LEVEL 4

75

31%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

193
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

7

3%

LEVEL 2

51

20%

LEVEL 3

95

38%

LEVEL 4

98

39%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

5

25%

LEVEL 2

6

30%

LEVEL 3

6

30%

LEVEL 4

3

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

3

11%

LEVEL 2

9

33%

LEVEL 3

11

41%

LEVEL 4

4

15%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

168
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

18

7%

LEVEL 2

58

24%

LEVEL 3

91

37%

LEVEL 4

77

32%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

200
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

7

3%

LEVEL 2

54

21%

LEVEL 3

100

38%

LEVEL 4

100

38%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

6
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

5

33%

LEVEL 2

4

27%

LEVEL 3

5

33%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

8
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

3

18%

LEVEL 2

6

35%

LEVEL 3

6

35%

LEVEL 4

2

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

8

28%

LEVEL 3

10

34%

LEVEL 4

10

34%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

7

18%

LEVEL 3

16

42%

LEVEL 4

15

39%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

154
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

22

10%

LEVEL 2

54

23%

LEVEL 3

86

37%

LEVEL 4

68

30%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

177
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

10

4%

LEVEL 2

53

22%

LEVEL 3

90

38%

LEVEL 4

87

36%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

163
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

20

8%

LEVEL 2

58

24%

LEVEL 3

88

37%

LEVEL 4

75

31%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

197
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

10

4%

LEVEL 2

53

20%

LEVEL 3

97

37%

LEVEL 4

100

38%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

11
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

3

17%

LEVEL 2

4

22%

LEVEL 3

8

44%

LEVEL 4

3

17%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

11
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

7

39%

LEVEL 3

9

50%

LEVEL 4

2

11%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.