Skip to Content
Main content

ICAHN CHARTER SCHOOL 2 GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

179
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

7

3%

LEVEL 2

22

11%

LEVEL 3

60

29%

LEVEL 4

119

57%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

155
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

9

5%

LEVEL 3

53

32%

LEVEL 4

102

61%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

105
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

7

6%

LEVEL 2

15

12%

LEVEL 3

38

30%

LEVEL 4

67

53%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

90
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

7

7%

LEVEL 3

33

33%

LEVEL 4

57

58%

MALE

PROFICIENT

74
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

7

9%

LEVEL 3

22

27%

LEVEL 4

52

64%

MALE

PROFICIENT

65
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

2

3%

LEVEL 3

20

29%

LEVEL 4

45

66%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

10
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

9%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

9

82%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

62
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

4

6%

LEVEL 3

21

31%

LEVEL 4

41

60%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

54
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

2

4%

LEVEL 2

1

2%

LEVEL 3

17

30%

LEVEL 4

37

65%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

103
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

5

4%

LEVEL 2

16

13%

LEVEL 3

38

31%

LEVEL 4

65

52%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

82
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

8

9%

LEVEL 3

34

37%

LEVEL 4

48

53%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

159
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

18

10%

LEVEL 3

51

28%

LEVEL 4

108

60%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

140
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

6

4%

LEVEL 3

48

33%

LEVEL 4

92

63%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

20
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

3

11%

LEVEL 2

4

15%

LEVEL 3

9

33%

LEVEL 4

11

41%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

2

10%

LEVEL 2

3

15%

LEVEL 3

5

25%

LEVEL 4

10

50%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

174
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

7

4%

LEVEL 2

19

10%

LEVEL 3

56

28%

LEVEL 4

118

59%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

4

50%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

60
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

5

7%

LEVEL 3

21

31%

LEVEL 4

39

58%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

70
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

26

37%

LEVEL 4

44

62%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

119
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

5

4%

LEVEL 2

17

12%

LEVEL 3

39

28%

LEVEL 4

80

57%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

85
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

9

9%

LEVEL 3

27

28%

LEVEL 4

58

60%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

159
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

7

4%

LEVEL 2

20

11%

LEVEL 3

51

27%

LEVEL 4

108

58%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

20
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

9%

LEVEL 3

9

41%

LEVEL 4

11

50%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.