BEDFORD STUY COLLEGIATE CHARTER SCH GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

142
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

39

15%

LEVEL 2

79

30%

LEVEL 3

74

28%

LEVEL 4

68

26%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

170
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

33

12%

LEVEL 2

63

24%

LEVEL 3

91

34%

LEVEL 4

79

30%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

63
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

15

13%

LEVEL 2

39

33%

LEVEL 3

35

30%

LEVEL 4

28

24%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

90
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

8

6%

LEVEL 2

33

25%

LEVEL 3

47

36%

LEVEL 4

43

33%

MALE

PROFICIENT

79
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

24

17%

LEVEL 2

40

28%

LEVEL 3

39

27%

LEVEL 4

40

28%

MALE

PROFICIENT

80
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

25

19%

LEVEL 2

30

22%

LEVEL 3

44

33%

LEVEL 4

36

27%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

3

60%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

3

50%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

79
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

25

16%

LEVEL 2

54

34%

LEVEL 3

46

29%

LEVEL 4

33

21%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

91
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

25

16%

LEVEL 2

42

27%

LEVEL 3

56

35%

LEVEL 4

35

22%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

55
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

13

14%

LEVEL 2

23

25%

LEVEL 3

27

30%

LEVEL 4

28

31%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

71
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

5

5%

LEVEL 2

19

20%

LEVEL 3

35

37%

LEVEL 4

36

38%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

126
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

25

12%

LEVEL 2

64

30%

LEVEL 3

64

30%

LEVEL 4

62

29%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

150
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

17

8%

LEVEL 2

46

22%

LEVEL 3

79

37%

LEVEL 4

71

33%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

16
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

14

31%

LEVEL 2

15

33%

LEVEL 3

10

22%

LEVEL 4

6

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

20
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

16

30%

LEVEL 2

17

32%

LEVEL 3

12

23%

LEVEL 4

8

15%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

139
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

33

13%

LEVEL 2

76

31%

LEVEL 3

72

29%

LEVEL 4

67

27%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

167
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

30

12%

LEVEL 2

56

22%

LEVEL 3

89

35%

LEVEL 4

78

31%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

6

50%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

3

23%

LEVEL 2

7

54%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

6

9%

LEVEL 2

21

32%

LEVEL 3

17

26%

LEVEL 4

21

32%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

9

26%

LEVEL 3

16

46%

LEVEL 4

9

26%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

104
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

33

17%

LEVEL 2

58

30%

LEVEL 3

57

29%

LEVEL 4

47

24%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

145
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

32

14%

LEVEL 2

54

23%

LEVEL 3

75

32%

LEVEL 4

70

30%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

132
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

37

16%

LEVEL 2

67

28%

LEVEL 3

68

29%

LEVEL 4

64

27%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

10
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

2

8%

LEVEL 2

12

50%

LEVEL 3

6

25%

LEVEL 4

4

17%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.