BROOKLYN EAST COLLEGIATE CHARTER SCH GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

124
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

48

21%

LEVEL 2

54

24%

LEVEL 3

69

31%

LEVEL 4

55

24%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

119
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

35

18%

LEVEL 2

41

21%

LEVEL 3

70

36%

LEVEL 4

49

25%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

60
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

14

13%

LEVEL 2

32

30%

LEVEL 3

34

32%

LEVEL 4

26

25%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

63
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

10

11%

LEVEL 2

17

19%

LEVEL 3

37

41%

LEVEL 4

26

29%

MALE

PROFICIENT

64
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

34

28%

LEVEL 2

22

18%

LEVEL 3

35

29%

LEVEL 4

29

24%

MALE

PROFICIENT

56
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

25

24%

LEVEL 2

24

23%

LEVEL 3

33

31%

LEVEL 4

23

22%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

4
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

4

36%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

4

36%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

107
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

36

19%

LEVEL 2

47

25%

LEVEL 3

59

31%

LEVEL 4

48

25%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

102
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

29

18%

LEVEL 2

34

21%

LEVEL 3

58

35%

LEVEL 4

44

27%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

6

32%

LEVEL 2

2

11%

LEVEL 3

5

26%

LEVEL 4

6

32%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

1

7%

LEVEL 2

4

27%

LEVEL 3

7

47%

LEVEL 4

3

20%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

112
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

26

14%

LEVEL 2

46

25%

LEVEL 3

61

33%

LEVEL 4

51

28%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

105
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

20

13%

LEVEL 2

35

22%

LEVEL 3

59

37%

LEVEL 4

46

29%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

22

52%

LEVEL 2

8

19%

LEVEL 3

8

19%

LEVEL 4

4

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

15

43%

LEVEL 2

6

17%

LEVEL 3

11

31%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

122
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

46

21%

LEVEL 2

51

23%

LEVEL 3

67

31%

LEVEL 4

55

25%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

117
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

30

16%

LEVEL 2

38

21%

LEVEL 3

68

37%

LEVEL 4

49

26%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

5

50%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

12

29%

LEVEL 2

9

22%

LEVEL 3

9

22%

LEVEL 4

11

27%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

3

9%

LEVEL 2

8

23%

LEVEL 3

11

31%

LEVEL 4

13

37%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

104
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

36

19%

LEVEL 2

45

24%

LEVEL 3

60

32%

LEVEL 4

44

24%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

95
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

32

20%

LEVEL 2

33

21%

LEVEL 3

59

37%

LEVEL 4

36

23%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

110
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

43

22%

LEVEL 2

46

23%

LEVEL 3

60

30%

LEVEL 4

50

25%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

14
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

5

19%

LEVEL 2

8

30%

LEVEL 3

9

33%

LEVEL 4

5

19%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.