BROWNSVILLE COLLEGIATE CHARTER SCH GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

107
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

72

31%

LEVEL 2

54

23%

LEVEL 3

69

30%

LEVEL 4

38

16%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

96
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

65

30%

LEVEL 2

55

25%

LEVEL 3

51

24%

LEVEL 4

45

21%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

62
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

28

25%

LEVEL 2

23

20%

LEVEL 3

41

36%

LEVEL 4

21

19%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

51
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

25

26%

LEVEL 2

21

22%

LEVEL 3

22

23%

LEVEL 4

29

30%

MALE

PROFICIENT

45
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

44

37%

LEVEL 2

31

26%

LEVEL 3

28

23%

LEVEL 4

17

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

45
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

40

34%

LEVEL 2

34

29%

LEVEL 3

29

24%

LEVEL 4

16

13%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

81
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

48

29%

LEVEL 2

35

21%

LEVEL 3

56

34%

LEVEL 4

25

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

68
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

39

27%

LEVEL 2

37

26%

LEVEL 3

37

26%

LEVEL 4

31

22%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

21
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

21

35%

LEVEL 2

18

30%

LEVEL 3

10

17%

LEVEL 4

11

18%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

21
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

23

38%

LEVEL 2

17

28%

LEVEL 3

9

15%

LEVEL 4

12

20%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

100
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

47

25%

LEVEL 2

41

22%

LEVEL 3

63

34%

LEVEL 4

37

20%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

86
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

35

21%

LEVEL 2

45

27%

LEVEL 3

43

26%

LEVEL 4

43

26%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

25

56%

LEVEL 2

13

29%

LEVEL 3

6

13%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

30

60%

LEVEL 2

10

20%

LEVEL 3

8

16%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

104
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

61

28%

LEVEL 2

50

23%

LEVEL 3

67

31%

LEVEL 4

37

17%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

94
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

53

27%

LEVEL 2

51

26%

LEVEL 3

49

25%

LEVEL 4

45

23%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

11

61%

LEVEL 2

4

22%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

12

67%

LEVEL 2

4

22%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

11

50%

LEVEL 2

3

14%

LEVEL 3

6

27%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

4

21%

LEVEL 2

2

11%

LEVEL 3

7

37%

LEVEL 4

6

32%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

99
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

61

29%

LEVEL 2

51

24%

LEVEL 3

63

30%

LEVEL 4

36

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

83
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

61

31%

LEVEL 2

53

27%

LEVEL 3

44

22%

LEVEL 4

39

20%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

93
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

57

29%

LEVEL 2

49

25%

LEVEL 3

58

29%

LEVEL 4

35

18%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

14
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

15

44%

LEVEL 2

5

15%

LEVEL 3

11

32%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.