LEADERSHIP PREP BROWNSVILLE CHARTER GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

290
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 418

LEVEL 1

47

11%

LEVEL 2

81

19%

LEVEL 3

140

33%

LEVEL 4

150

36%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

296
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 415

LEVEL 1

40

10%

LEVEL 2

79

19%

LEVEL 3

157

38%

LEVEL 4

139

33%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

162
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

21

9%

LEVEL 2

41

18%

LEVEL 3

78

35%

LEVEL 4

84

38%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

180
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

15

7%

LEVEL 2

34

15%

LEVEL 3

98

43%

LEVEL 4

82

36%

MALE

PROFICIENT

128
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

26

13%

LEVEL 2

40

21%

LEVEL 3

62

32%

LEVEL 4

66

34%

MALE

PROFICIENT

116
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

25

13%

LEVEL 2

45

24%

LEVEL 3

59

32%

LEVEL 4

57

31%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

241
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 350

LEVEL 1

41

12%

LEVEL 2

68

19%

LEVEL 3

121

35%

LEVEL 4

120

34%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

245
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

34

10%

LEVEL 2

67

19%

LEVEL 3

133

38%

LEVEL 4

112

32%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

43
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

6

10%

LEVEL 2

11

18%

LEVEL 3

19

32%

LEVEL 4

24

40%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

45
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

5

8%

LEVEL 2

11

18%

LEVEL 3

21

34%

LEVEL 4

24

39%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

275
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 358

LEVEL 1

24

7%

LEVEL 2

59

16%

LEVEL 3

129

36%

LEVEL 4

146

41%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

271
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

17

5%

LEVEL 2

64

18%

LEVEL 3

137

39%

LEVEL 4

134

38%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

23

38%

LEVEL 2

22

37%

LEVEL 3

11

18%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

25
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

23

37%

LEVEL 2

15

24%

LEVEL 3

20

32%

LEVEL 4

5

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

286
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 413

LEVEL 1

47

11%

LEVEL 2

80

19%

LEVEL 3

137

33%

LEVEL 4

149

36%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

293
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 410

LEVEL 1

39

10%

LEVEL 2

78

19%

LEVEL 3

155

38%

LEVEL 4

138

34%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

3

60%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

3

8%

LEVEL 2

5

14%

LEVEL 3

11

30%

LEVEL 4

18

49%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

39
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

3

7%

LEVEL 2

3

7%

LEVEL 3

17

38%

LEVEL 4

22

49%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

261
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 381

LEVEL 1

44

12%

LEVEL 2

76

20%

LEVEL 3

129

34%

LEVEL 4

132

35%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

257
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 370

LEVEL 1

37

10%

LEVEL 2

76

21%

LEVEL 3

140

38%

LEVEL 4

117

32%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

256
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 373

LEVEL 1

38

10%

LEVEL 2

79

21%

LEVEL 3

123

33%

LEVEL 4

133

36%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

34
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

9

20%

LEVEL 2

2

4%

LEVEL 3

17

38%

LEVEL 4

17

38%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.