ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

363
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 530

LEVEL 1

44

8%

LEVEL 2

123

23%

LEVEL 3

184

35%

LEVEL 4

179

34%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

391
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 562

LEVEL 1

47

8%

LEVEL 2

124

22%

LEVEL 3

174

31%

LEVEL 4

217

39%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

200
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

28

10%

LEVEL 2

63

22%

LEVEL 3

112

38%

LEVEL 4

88

30%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

202
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

20

7%

LEVEL 2

81

27%

LEVEL 3

96

32%

LEVEL 4

106

35%

MALE

PROFICIENT

163
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

16

7%

LEVEL 2

60

25%

LEVEL 3

72

30%

LEVEL 4

91

38%

MALE

PROFICIENT

189
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

27

10%

LEVEL 2

43

17%

LEVEL 3

78

30%

LEVEL 4

111

43%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

4

44%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

4

33%

LEVEL 4

4

33%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

5
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

3

43%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

247
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 368

LEVEL 1

36

10%

LEVEL 2

85

23%

LEVEL 3

130

35%

LEVEL 4

117

32%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

233
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

33

9%

LEVEL 2

90

25%

LEVEL 3

97

27%

LEVEL 4

136

38%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

100
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

7

5%

LEVEL 2

36

25%

LEVEL 3

47

33%

LEVEL 4

53

37%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

142
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

11

6%

LEVEL 2

29

16%

LEVEL 3

71

39%

LEVEL 4

71

39%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

357
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 507

LEVEL 1

36

7%

LEVEL 2

114

22%

LEVEL 3

180

36%

LEVEL 4

177

35%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

381
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 532

LEVEL 1

34

6%

LEVEL 2

117

22%

LEVEL 3

165

31%

LEVEL 4

216

41%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

8

35%

LEVEL 2

9

39%

LEVEL 3

4

17%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

13

43%

LEVEL 2

7

23%

LEVEL 3

9

30%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

356
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 511

LEVEL 1

40

8%

LEVEL 2

115

23%

LEVEL 3

180

35%

LEVEL 4

176

34%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

384
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 544

LEVEL 1

43

8%

LEVEL 2

117

22%

LEVEL 3

168

31%

LEVEL 4

216

40%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

7
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

4

21%

LEVEL 2

8

42%

LEVEL 3

4

21%

LEVEL 4

3

16%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

7
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

4

22%

LEVEL 2

7

39%

LEVEL 3

6

33%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

56
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

9

11%

LEVEL 2

18

22%

LEVEL 3

25

30%

LEVEL 4

31

37%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

71
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

6

6%

LEVEL 2

29

27%

LEVEL 3

33

31%

LEVEL 4

38

36%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

307
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 447

LEVEL 1

35

8%

LEVEL 2

105

23%

LEVEL 3

159

36%

LEVEL 4

148

33%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

320
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 456

LEVEL 1

41

9%

LEVEL 2

95

21%

LEVEL 3

141

31%

LEVEL 4

179

39%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.